Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29950586›Full record

ArticleNPJ schizophrenia2018

Risk of weight gain for specific antipsychotic drugs: a meta-analysis.

Jacob Spertus, Marcela Horvitz-Lennon, Haley Abing, Sharon-Lise Normand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ schizophrenia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Metabolic adverse effects of off-label use of second-generation antipsychotics in the adult population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Bayesian Meta-analysis of Multiple Continuous Treatments with Individual Participant-Level Data: An Application to Antipsychotic Drugs.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Mechanism and treatments of antipsychotic-induced weight gain.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jacob SpertusDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Marcela Horvitz-LennonCambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, 1493 Cambridge Street, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Haley AbingDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Sharon-Lise NormandDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. sharon@hcp.med.harvard.edu.

Funding

Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001102 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2013 to 2017
$106.2M
Improving Value of Publicly Funded Mental Health CareR01MH106682 · NIMH · RAND CORPORATION · PI HORVITZ-LENNON, MARCELA V, NORMAND, SHARON-LISE TERESA · 2016 to 2019
$2.6M
Bayesian Methods for Comparative Effectiveness Research with Observational DataR01GM111339 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NORMAND, SHARON-LISE TERESA · 2015 to 2018
$2.5M
Harvard Catalyst (Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center) UL1 TR001102NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001102NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM111339NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106682U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) R01-MH106682U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) R01-MH106682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with schizophrenia are at considerably higher risk of cardiometabolic morbidity than the general population. Second-generation antipsychotic drugs contribute to that risk partly through their weight gain effects, exacerbating an already high burden of disease. While standard 'as-randomized' analyses of clinical trials provide valuable information, they ignore adherence patterns across treatment arms, confounding estimates of realized treatment exposure on outcome. We assess the effect of specific second-generation antipsychotics on weight gain, defined as at least a 7% increase in weight from randomization, using a Bayesian hierarchical model network meta-analysis with individual patient level data. Our data consisted of 14 randomized clinical trials contributing 5923 subjects (mean age = 39 [SD = 12]) assessing various combinations of olanzapine (n = 533), paliperidone (n = 3482), risperidone (n = 540), and placebo (n = 1368). The median time from randomization to dropout or trial completion was 6 weeks (range: 0-60 weeks). The unadjusted probability of weight gain in the placebo group was 4.8% across trials. For each 10 g chlorpromazine equivalent dose increase in olanzapine, the odds of weight gain increased by 5 (95% credible interval: 1.4, 5.3); the effect of risperidone (odds ratio = 1.6 [0.25, 9.1]) was estimated with considerable uncertainty but no different from paliperidone (odds ratio = 1.3 [1.2, 1.5]).

Identifiers

PMID29950586
PMCPMC6021430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.