Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29950570›Full record

ReviewNature cell biology2018

Mechanisms and impact of altered tumour mechanics.

Hamid Mohammadi, Erik Sahai

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature cell biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 187 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
187citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

187 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. 3DACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Understanding and targeting the tumour matrisome.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

127 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hamid MohammadiFrancis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Erik SahaiFrancis Crick Institute, London, UK. erik.sahai@crick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3932-5086

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The physical characteristics of tumours are intricately linked to the tumour phenotype and difficulties during treatment. Many factors contribute to the increased stiffness of tumours; from increased matrix deposition, matrix remodelling by forces from cancer cells and stromal fibroblasts, matrix crosslinking, increased cellularity, and the build-up of both solid and interstitial pressure. Increased stiffness then feeds back to increase tumour invasiveness and reduce therapy efficacy. Increased understanding of this interplay is offering new therapeutic avenues.

Indexed as

Mechanotransduction, CellularAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell CommunicationElasticityExtracellular MatrixHumansNeoplasmsPhenotypePressureStress, MechanicalStromal CellsTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.