Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29950520›Full record

SynthesisJournal of epidemiology and community health2018

Mental health benefits of interactions with nature in children and teenagers: a systematic review.

Suzanne Tillmann, Danielle Tobin, William Avison, Jason Gilliland

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 136 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
136citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

136 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Exploring connections between pollinator health and human health.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Life Course Nature Exposure and Mental Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Future Directions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  10. Indicators of Healthy Architecture-a Systematic Literature Review.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2020
    Pooled it
  11. The Association between Green Space and Adolescents' Mental Well-Being: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

76 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Suzanne TillmannDepartment of Geography, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Danielle TobinDepartment of Geography, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
William AvisonDepartment of Sociology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Jason GillilandDepartment of Geography, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is commonly believed that nature has positive impacts on children's health, including physical, mental and social dimensions. This review focuses on how accessibility to, exposure to and engagement with nature affects the mental health of children and teenagers.

methodsTen academic databases were used to systematically search and identify primary research papers in English or French from 1990 to 1 March 2017. Papers were included for review based on their incorporation of nature, children and teenagers (0-18 years), quantitative results and focus on mental health.

resultsOf the 35 papers included in the review, the majority focused on emotional well-being and attention deficit disorder/hyperactivity disorder. Other outcome measures included overall mental health, self-esteem, stress, resilience, depression and health-related quality of life. About half of all reported findings revealed statistically significant positive relationships between nature and mental health outcomes and almost half reported no statistical significance.

conclusionsFindings support the contention that nature positively influences mental health; however, in most cases, additional research with more rigorous study designs and objective measures of both nature and mental health outcomes are needed to confirm statistically significant relationships. Existing evidence is limited by the cross-sectional nature of most papers.

Indexed as

Mental HealthNatureAdolescentAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansMalePersonal SatisfactionSelf ConceptStress, Psychologicalchild healthenvironmental healthgeographymental healthstress

Identifiers

PMID29950520
PMCPMC6161651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.