Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29950472›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Health system costs of potentially inappropriate prescribing in Ontario, Canada: a protocol for a population-based cohort study.

Cody D Black, Kednapa Thavorn, Douglas Coyle, Glenys Smith, Lise M Bjerre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Prevalence and predictors of potentially inappropriate prescribing in middle-aged adults: a repeated cross-sectional study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  4. On the use of the "Translational andrology and urology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cody D BlackSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Kednapa ThavornSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Douglas CoyleSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Glenys SmithICES uOttawa, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Lise M BjerreSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 287245-HPM-BRUY-46830
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdverse drug events (ADEs) are common in older persons and contribute significantly to emergency department visits, hospitalisations and mortality. ADEs are often due to potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIP) or potentially inappropriate omissions (PIO), and are avoidable if inappropriate prescriptions or omissions are identified and prevented. Identifying PIP/PIO at the population level through the application of PIP/PIO assessment tools to health administrative data can provide a unique opportunity to assess the economic burden of PIP/PIO on the healthcare system beyond medication costs which is yet to be done. The objective of this study is to assess the economic burden associated with PIP/PIO and to estimate the incremental costs associated with distinct PIP/PIO in the province of Ontario. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a retrospective cohort study using Ontario's health administrative databases. Eligible patients aged 66 years and older who were prescribed at least one medication between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2014 (approximately 2.4 million patients) will be included. Population attributable fraction methodology will be used to assess the overall burden of PIP in Ontario, while regression analyses will be used to estimate the incremental costs of having specific PIP criteria and aid in prioritising targets for intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada. Dissemination will occur via publication, presentation at national and international conferences, and knowledge exchange with various stakeholders.

Indexed as

Potentially Inappropriate Medication ListResearch DesignAgedAged, 80 and overDatabases, FactualDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHealth Care CostsHospitalizationHumansInappropriate PrescribingMaleOntarioRegression AnalysisRetrospective Studiesepidemiologyhealth economicshealth policytherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID29950472
PMCPMC6020945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.