Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29950465›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

A Reduction in Time with Electronic Monitoring In Stroke (ARTEMIS): study protocol for a randomised multicentre trial.

Gaia T Koster, T Truc My Nguyen, Adrien E D Groot, Jonathan M Coutinho, Jan Bosch, Heleen M den Hertog, Marianne A A van Walderveen, Ale Algra, Marieke J H Wermer, Yvo B Roos and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02808806 (A Reduction in Time With Electronic Monitoring In Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02808806 naterminatednot on this map

A Reduction in Time With Electronic Monitoring In Stroke (ARTEMIS) Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLeiden UniversityRan2017 to 2020Enrolled80ConditionsAcute Ischemic Stroke, StrokeArmsreal-time audio-visual feedback
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Clinical prediction of thrombectomy eligibility: A systematic review and 4-item decision tree.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Gaia T KosterDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7138-5313
T Truc My NguyenDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Adrien E D GrootDepartment of Neurology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jonathan M CoutinhoDepartment of Neurology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan BoschDepartment of Research and Development, Regional Emergency Medical Services Hollands Midden, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Heleen M den HertogDepartment of Neurology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Marianne A A van WalderveenDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ale AlgraJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marieke J H WermerDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Yvo B RoosDepartment of Neurology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nyika D KruytDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
ARTEMIS investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTime is the most crucial factor limiting efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and intra-arterial thrombectomy (IAT). The delay between alarming the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) dispatch office and IVT/IAT initiation, that is, the METHODS AND ANALYSIS: ARTEMIS is a multiregional, multicentre, randomised open end-point trial including patients ≥18 years considered IVT/IAT-eligible by the EMS dispatch office or on-site EMS personnel. Patients are electronically tracked and randomised for real-time audio-visual feedback on TSD to caregivers via premounted handhelds and tablets throughout the TSD trajectory. Primary outcome is TSD to IVT/IAT. Secondary outcomes comprise proportion of IVT/IAT-treated patients, symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage, IVT/IAT-treated stroke mimics, clinical outcome after three months and cost-effectiveness. Separate analyses for IAT-patients with or without prior IVT, within or out of office hours and EMS region will be performed. With 75 IAT-patients and 225 IVT-patients in each arm, we will be able to demonstrate a 20 min difference in TSD to IAT and a 10 min difference in TSD to IVT (p=0.05 and power=0.8). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and (inter)national conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02808806; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesFibrinolytic AgentsHumansMonitoring, AmbulatoryMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStrokeThrombectomyTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeFibrinolytic Agentsacute ischemic strokeintra-arterial thrombectomyintravenous thrombolysistime to treatmenttotal system delaytreatment delay

Identifiers

PMID29950465
PMCPMC6020955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.