Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29950460›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Effectiveness of policy and risk targeting for opioid-related risk mitigation: a randomised programme evaluation with stepped-wedge design.

Taeko Minegishi, Melissa M Garrido, Steven D Pizer, Austin B Frakt

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Israel should build capacity in implementation science.Israel journal of health policy research · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Assessing opioid overdose risk: a review of clinical prediction models utilizing patient-level data.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Tramadol Prescription over a 4-Year Period in the USA.Current pain and headache reports · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Taeko MinegishiPartnered Evidence-based Policy Resource Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6613-201X
Melissa M GarridoPartnered Evidence-based Policy Resource Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Steven D PizerPartnered Evidence-based Policy Resource Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Austin B FraktPartnered Evidence-based Policy Resource Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

HSRD VA CDP 12-255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is an epidemic of opioid use related to adverse events and deaths in the USA. The rates of chronic pain, mental illness and substance use disorder are higher at the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) compared with the general US population. The 2016 Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act requires the VHA to improve opioid therapy strategies in treating patients and to ensure responsible prescribing practices. The Stratification Tool for Opioid Risk Mitigation (STORM) is a web-based dashboard that prioritises review of VHA patients receiving opioids based on their risk. The VHA Partnered Evidence-based Policy Resource Center is coordinating a multiyear evaluation of STORM and aspects of the VHA policy that mandate case review of patients identified by STORM as very high risk. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial will test two hypotheses: (1) VHA medical centres randomised to facilitation for not meeting the targeted case review rate will achieve lower opioid-related serious adverse events (SAEs), relative to facilities not randomised to facilitation and (2) Patients whose cases are required to be reviewed will have a lower rate of opioid-related SAEs compared with comparable risk patients whose cases are not required to be reviewed. Patients who receive an opioid prescription at VHA medical centres will be followed for a minimum of 3 months after their first opioid prescription. Follow-up will continue until the last day of the project or death. The data will be analysed using an intention-to-treat approach with patient-month-level Cox proportional hazards models for both interventions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Evaluation of the randomised roll-out was approved by the VA Boston Healthcare System Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Research & Development Committees (Protocol # 3069). Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at national conference meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN16012111.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidDrug OverdoseHealth Plan ImplementationHealth PolicyHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicOpioid-Related DisordersOrganizational PolicyProportional Hazards ModelsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk ManagementUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsAnalgesics, Opioidopioidsrandomised programme evaluationunited states veterans administration

Identifiers

PMID29950460
PMCPMC6020973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.