Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29950347›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2018

Quantitative Proteomic Analysis Identifies AHNAK (Neuroblast Differentiation-associated Protein AHNAK) as a Novel Candidate Biomarker for Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma Diagnosis by Liquid-based Cytology.

Hyebin Lee, Kwangsoo Kim, Jongmin Woo, Joonho Park, Hyeyoon Kim, Kyung Eun Lee, Hyeyeon Kim, Youngsoo Kim, Kyung Chul Moon, Ji Young Kim and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The application of high-throughput proteomics in cytopathology.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hyebin LeeFrom the ‡Department of Radiation Oncology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Kwangsoo Kim§Division of Clinical Bioinformatics, Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Jongmin Woo¶Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Joonho Park¶Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyeyoon Kim‖Proteomics Core Facility, Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Kyung Eun Lee‡‡Department of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyeyeon Kim‖Proteomics Core Facility, Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Youngsoo Kim¶Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Kyung Chul Moon**Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Ji Young Kim**Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
In Ae Park**Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Bo Bae Shim**Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Ji Hye Moon**Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Dohyun Han§Division of Clinical Bioinformatics, Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; karlnash@naver.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0841-1598
Han Suk Ryu**Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; karlnash@naver.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2508-9796
Seoul National University Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KRKangbuk Samsung Hospital · KRStatistics Korea · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytological examination of urine is the most widely used noninvasive pathologic screen for bladder urothelial carcinoma (BLCA); however, inadequate diagnostic accuracy remains a major challenge. We performed mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis of urine samples of ten patients with BLCA and ten paired patients with benign urothelial lesion (BUL) to identify ancillary proteomic markers for use in liquid-based cytology (LBC). A total of 4,839 proteins were identified and 112 proteins were confirmed as expressed at significantly different levels between the two groups. We also performed an independent proteomic profiling of tumor tissue samples where we identified 7,916 proteins of which 758 were differentially expressed. Cross-platform comparisons of these data with comparative mRNA expression profiles from The Cancer Genome Atlas identified four putative candidate proteins, AHNAK, EPPK1, MYH14 and OLFM4. To determine their immunocytochemical expression levels in LBC, we examined protein expression data from The Human Protein Atlas and in-house FFPE samples. We further investigated the expression of the four candidate proteins in urine cytology samples from two independent validation cohorts. These analyses revealed AHNAK as a unique intracellular protein differing in immunohistochemical expression and subcellular localization between tumor and non-tumor cells. In conclusion, this study identified a new biomarker, AHNAK, applicable to discrimination between BLCA and BUL by LBC. To our knowledge, the present study provides the first identification of a clinical biomarker for LBC based on in-depth proteomics.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCytological TechniquesFemaleFormaldehydeHumansMaleMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedNeoplasm ProteinsParaffin EmbeddingProteomeProteomicsReproducibility of ResultsRNA, MessengerAHNAK protein, humanBiomarkers, TumorFormaldehydeMembrane ProteinsNeoplasm ProteinsProteomeRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID29950347
PMCPMC6126387
OpenAlexW2810764565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.