Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29950316›Full record

Trial reportProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Dissecting the neurofunctional bases of intentional action.

Laura Zapparoli, Silvia Seghezzi, Paola Scifo, Alberto Zerbi, Giuseppe Banfi, Marco Tettamanti, Eraldo Paulesu

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Dorsal visual stream is preferentially engaged during externally guided action selection in Parkinson Disease.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. How Beat Perception Co-opts Motor Neurophysiology.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura ZapparolifMRI Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy; laura.zapparoli@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9210-942X
Silvia SeghezziPsychology Department, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Paola ScifoNuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Alberto ZerbifMRI Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe BanfifMRI Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy.
Marco TettamantiNuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3039-1500
Eraldo PaulesufMRI Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we challenge and present evidence that expands the

Indexed as

ConnectomeDiffusion Tensor ImagingGyrus CinguliIntentionMagnetic Resonance ImagingModels, NeurologicalMotor CortexAdultFemaleHumansMaleDTIfMRIintentional actionmotor controlwww-model

Identifiers

PMID29950316
PMCPMC6048480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.