Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29950289›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2018

Applications of Space Technologies to Global Health: Scoping Review.

Damien Dietrich, Ralitza Dekova, Stephan Davy, Guillaume Fahrni, Antoine Geissbühler

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Environment Changes, Aflatoxins, and Health Issues, a Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Damien Dietrich *Hopitaux Universitaires de Genève, eHealth and Telemedicine Division, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6554-7160
Ralitza Dekova *Hopitaux Universitaires de Genève, eHealth and Telemedicine Division, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3519-1164
Stephan DavyHopitaux Universitaires de Genève, eHealth and Telemedicine Division, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7321-7452
Guillaume FahrniHopitaux Universitaires de Genève, eHealth and Telemedicine Division, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1583-9602
Antoine GeissbühlerHopitaux Universitaires de Genève, eHealth and Telemedicine Division, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5039-3373

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpace technology has an impact on many domains of activity on earth, including in the field of global health. With the recent adoption of the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals that highlight the need for strengthening partnerships in different domains, it is useful to better characterize the relationship between space technology and global health.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to identify the applications of space technologies to global health, the key stakeholders in the field, as well as gaps and challenges.

methodsWe used a scoping review methodology, including a literature review and the involvement of stakeholders, via a brief self-administered, open-response questionnaire. A distinct search on several search engines was conducted for each of the four key technological domains that were previously identified by the UN Office for Outer Space Affairs' Expert Group on Space and Global Health (Domain A: remote sensing; Domain B: global navigation satellite systems; Domain C: satellite communication; and Domain D: human space flight). Themes in which space technologies are of benefit to global health were extracted. Key stakeholders, as well as gaps, challenges, and perspectives were identified.

resultsA total of 222 sources were included for Domain A, 82 sources for Domain B, 144 sources for Domain C, and 31 sources for Domain D. A total of 3 questionnaires out of 16 sent were answered. Global navigation satellite systems and geographic information systems are used for the study and forecasting of communicable and noncommunicable diseases; satellite communication and global navigation satellite systems for disaster response; satellite communication for telemedicine and tele-education; and global navigation satellite systems for autonomy improvement, access to health care, as well as for safe and efficient transportation. Various health research and technologies developed for inhabited space flights have been adapted for terrestrial use.

conclusionsAlthough numerous examples of space technology applications to global health exist, improved awareness, training, and collaboration of the research community is needed.

Indexed as

Global HealthHumansSatellite CommunicationsTechnologygeographic information systemsglobal healthglobal positioning systempublic healthremote sensing technologysatellite communicationssatellite imageryspaceflightspace medicinetelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID29950289
PMCPMC6041558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.