ArticlePrimary health care research & development2018
A multi-site exploration of barriers faced by vulnerable patient populations: a qualitative analysis exploring the needs of patients for targeted interventions in new models of care delivery.
Article in Primary health care research & development, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protocol for a Pilot Quasi-Experimental Study on the Effect of Patient-Centered Education on HIV Virological Outcomes Among Adult People Live With HIV-HBV Co-Infection in North-West Ethiopia: Protocol for a Pilot Quasi-Experimental Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- 'I Took TB Medicine for Six Months Without Having TB': Personal and Institutional Factors Affecting Trust in Healthcare Among African Immigrants in Florida, United States.The International journal of health planning and management · 2026Article
- Article
- Understanding challenges in healthcare access: qualitative insights from healthcare providers and people living in socio-economically vulnerable circumstances.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Social Determinants of Self-Reported Health in Vulnerable Populations During a Polycrisis in Lebanon.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Evaluation of patient satisfaction after primary care system interventions: a follow-up study.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- How Systemic Barriers Can Impact Health Inequities When Facing Climate Change Stressors: A Scoping Review of Global Differences.GeoHealth · 2025Review
- "The start of something that I hope could be greater": Health information technology tools for social care.SSM. Qualitative research in health · 2025Article
- Nurse navigation, symptom monitoring and exercise in vulnerable patients with lung cancer: feasibility of the NAVIGATE intervention.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Qualitative Research Methods in Chronic Disease: Introduction and Opportunities to Promote Health Equity.Annual review of public health · 2022Review
- Typology of organizational innovation components: building blocks to improve access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations.International journal for equity in health · 2020Review
- Liver Disease Monitoring Practices After Hepatitis C Cure in the Underserved Population.Hepatology communications · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo investigate which populations of patients are considered 'vulnerable' across varying clinical sites, and to identify the barriers encountered by these patient populations limiting optimal health.
backgroundVulnerable patient populations encounter diverse barriers that limit their ability to successfully navigate the health system, potentially resulting in poor health outcomes. Little current-day work has described types of barriers encountered by vulnerable patient populations across numerous clinical sites and settings, which is necessary to ensure health systems can begin to improve quality and disparities for all patient populations.
methodsAn inductive content analysis was performed based on field-site notes and digitally recorded telephone interviews with providers/leadership at clinics/programs related to patient- and clinic-needs from January 2014 through May 2015. Using thematic analysis with grounded theory techniques, authors identified categories and themes. In total, 30 diverse clinical sites/programs including inpatient- and outpatient-based clinics providing medicine and surgery-based services were assessed through both site visits and follow-up telephone interviews. Follow-up interviews were conducted with one individual in various positions within sites/programs, including physicians (n=15), registered nurses (n=8), clinic managers/coordinators (n=2), clinical program coordinator (n=1), and care coordinator (n=1); one participant represented three clinical sites.
findingsIn total, 30 sites/programs (n=30) received both a site visit and follow-up interview. Commonly reported vulnerable patient populations included those with multiple chronic conditions, lower socioeconomic status, patients in a specific stage in the continuum of care, and patients with over- and under-utilization of resources without a clear etiology. Themes related to barriers included systems barriers (eg, insufficiencies of care processes), clinic barriers (eg, lack of resources), patient-related barriers (eg, housing, transportation), and provider-related barriers (eg, inadequate time and knowledge).
conclusionsThese results provide a framework to identify systems- and clinic-related barriers that can be used in population health management strategies aimed at improving health disparities within clinically diverse sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.