Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29950181›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2018

Comparison of village dog and wolf genomes highlights the role of the neural crest in dog domestication.

Amanda L Pendleton, Feichen Shen, Angela M Taravella, Sarah Emery, Krishna R Veeramah, Adam R Boyko, Jeffrey M Kidd

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 172 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Zoological research · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Reenacting a mouse genetic evolutionary arms race in yeast reveals that SLXL1/SLX compete with SLY1/2 for binding to Spindlins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda L PendletonDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Feichen ShenDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Angela M TaravellaDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Sarah EmeryDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Krishna R VeeramahDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
Adam R BoykoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 14853, USA.
Jeffrey M KiddDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. jmkidd@umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9631-1465
University of Michigan · USCornell University · USStony Brook University · US

Funding

University of Michigan Training Program in Genomic ScienceT32HG000040 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Sebastian Zoellner · 1995 to 2026
$16.4M
Tools for Genetic and Genomic Studies in the DogR24GM082910 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI ACLAND, GREGORY M · 2008 to 2011
$1.5M
Comprehensive Characterization of Canine Genomic Structural DiversityR01GM103961 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BOYKO, ADAM R, KIDD, JEFFREY M · 2013 to 2016
$986k
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000040NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103961NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM082910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDomesticated from gray wolves between 10 and 40 kya in Eurasia, dogs display a vast array of phenotypes that differ from their ancestors, yet mirror other domesticated animal species, a phenomenon known as the domestication syndrome. Here, we use signatures persisting in dog genomes to identify genes and pathways possibly altered by the selective pressures of domestication.

resultsWhole-genome SNP analyses of 43 globally distributed village dogs and 10 wolves differentiated signatures resulting from domestication rather than breed formation. We identified 246 candidate domestication regions containing 10.8 Mb of genome sequence and 429 genes. The regions share haplotypes with ancient dogs, suggesting that the detected signals are not the result of recent selection. Gene enrichments highlight numerous genes linked to neural crest and central nervous system development as well as neurological function. Read depth analysis suggests that copy number variation played a minor role in dog domestication.

conclusionsOur results identify genes that act early in embryogenesis and can confer phenotypes distinguishing domesticated dogs from wolves, such as tameness, smaller jaws, floppy ears, and diminished craniofacial development as the targets of selection during domestication. These differences reflect the phenotypes of the domestication syndrome, which can be explained by alterations in the migration or activity of neural crest cells during development. We propose that initial selection during early dog domestication was for behavior, a trait influenced by genes which act in the neural crest, which secondarily gave rise to the phenotypes of modern dogs.

Indexed as

DomesticationAnimalsDNA Copy Number VariationsDogsGenetic VariationGenomeHaplotypesNeural CrestPhenotypeSelection, GeneticWolvesCanineDomesticationNeural crestRetinoic acidSelection scan

Identifiers

PMID29950181
PMCPMC6022502
OpenAlexW2806382960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.