Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29950178›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2018

Importance of standardizing timing of hematocrit measurement when using cardiovascular magnetic resonance to calculate myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) based on pre- and post-contrast T1 mapping.

Henrik Engblom, Mikael Kanski, Sascha Kopic, David Nordlund, Christos G Xanthis, Robert Jablonowski, Einar Heiberg, Anthony H Aletras, Marcus Carlsson, Håkan Arheden

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance reference values ("normal values") in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: 2025 update.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Innovative Hematology Analysis Using Menstrual Blood.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024
    Article
  11. Quantification of myocardial extracellular volume without blood sampling.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Influence of hydration status on cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial T1 and T2 relaxation time assessment: an intraindividual study in healthy subjects.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: 2017/2018 in review.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Henrik EngblomDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Getingevägen 3, 221 85, Lund, Sweden. Henrik.engblom@med.lu.se.
Mikael KanskiDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Getingevägen 3, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
Sascha KopicDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Getingevägen 3, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
David NordlundDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Getingevägen 3, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
Christos G XanthisDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Getingevägen 3, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
Robert JablonowskiDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Getingevägen 3, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
Einar HeibergDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Getingevägen 3, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
Anthony H AletrasDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Getingevägen 3, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
Marcus CarlssonDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Getingevägen 3, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
Håkan ArhedenDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Getingevägen 3, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SEAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can be used to calculate myocardial extracellular volume fraction (ECV) by relating the longitudinal relaxation rate in blood and myocardium before and after contrast-injection to hematocrit (Hct) in blood. Hematocrit is known to vary with body posture, which could affect the calculations of ECV. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that there is a significant increase in calculated ECV values if the Hct is sampled after the CMR examination in supine position compared to when the patient arrives at the MR department.

methodsForty-three consecutive patients including various pathologies as well as normal findings were included in the study. Venous blood samples were drawn upon arrival to the MR department and directly after the examination with the patient remaining in supine position. A Modified Look-Locker Inversion recovery (MOLLI) protocol was used to acquire mid-ventricular short-axis images before and after contrast injection from which motion-corrected T1 maps were derived and ECV was calculated.

resultsHematocrit decreased from 44.0 ± 3.7% before to 40.6 ± 4.0% after the CMR examination (p < 0.001). This resulted in a change in calculated ECV from 24.7 ± 3.8% before to 26.2 ± 4.2% after the CMR examination (p < 0.001). All patients decreased in Hct after the CMR examination compared to before except for two patients whose Hct remained the same.

conclusionVariability in CMR-derived myocardial ECV can be reduced by standardizing the timing of Hct measurement relative to the CMR examination. Thus, a standardized acquisition of blood sample for Hct after the CMR examination, when the patient is still in supine position, would increase the precision of ECV measurements.

Indexed as

HematocritAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHeart DiseasesHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMyocardiumPatient PositioningPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsSupine PositionECVExtracellular volumeHematocritT1 mapping

Identifiers

PMID29950178
PMCPMC6022290
OpenAlexW2811023488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.