Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29950170›Full record

ArticleTrials2018

Evaluating parents' decisions about next-generation sequencing for their child in the NC NEXUS (North Carolina Newborn Exome Sequencing for Universal Screening) study: a randomized controlled trial protocol.

Laura V Milko, Christine Rini, Megan A Lewis, Rita M Butterfield, Feng-Chang Lin, Ryan S Paquin, Bradford C Powell, Myra I Roche, Katherine J Souris, Donald B Bailey and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02826694 (North Carolina Newborn Exome Sequencing for Universal Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02826694 nacompletednot on this map

North Carolina Newborn Exome Sequencing for Universal Screening

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2016 to 2019Enrolled106ConditionsMetabolism, Inborn Errors, Hearing Loss, Hereditary DiseaseArmsWell infant, whole exome sequencing, Diagnosed, whole exome sequencing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Values clarification and parental decision making about newborn genomic sequencing.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2020
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genomic newborn screening for rare diseases.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Newborn screening research sponsored by the NIH: From diagnostic paradigms to precision therapeutics.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura V MilkoDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Christine RiniDepartment of Biomedical Research, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, 07601, USA.
Megan A LewisCenter for Communication Science, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
Rita M ButterfieldDepartment of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Feng-Chang LinDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Ryan S PaquinCenter for Communication Science, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
Bradford C PowellDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Myra I RocheDepartment of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Katherine J SourisDepartment of Heath Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Donald B BaileyCenter for Newborn Screening, Ethics, and Disability Studies, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
Jonathan S BergDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Cynthia M PowellDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. powellcm@med.unc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4260-5601
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USRTI International · USHackensack University Medical Center · US

Funding

North Carolina Translational & Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UL1TR001111 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, CAREY, TIMOTHY S · 2013 to 2017
$43.9M
NC NEXUS, North Carolina Newborn Exome Sequencing for Universal ScreeningU19HD077632 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BERG, JONATHAN S, POWELL, CYNTHIA MARION · 2013 to 2018
$6.3M
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development U19HD077632National Human Genome Research Institute U19HD077632NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001111NICHD NIH HHS U19 HD077632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsing next-generation sequencing (NGS) in newborn screening (NBS) could expand the number of genetic conditions detected pre-symptomatically, simultaneously challenging current precedents, raising ethical concerns, and extending the role of parental decision-making in NBS. The NC NEXUS (Newborn Exome Sequencing for Universal Screening) study seeks to assess the technical possibilities and limitations of NGS-NBS, devise and evaluate a framework to convey various types of genetic information, and develop best practices for incorporating NGS-NBS into clinical care. The study is enrolling both a healthy cohort and a cohort diagnosed with known disorders identified through recent routine NBS. It uses a novel age-based metric to categorize a priori the large amount of data generated by NGS-NBS and interactive online decision aids to guide parental decision-making. Primary outcomes include: (1) assessment of NGS-NBS sensitivity, (2) decision regret, and (3) parental decision-making about NGS-NBS, and, for parents randomized to have the option of requesting them, additional findings (diagnosed and healthy cohorts). Secondary outcomes assess parents' reactions to the study and to decision-making. METHODS/

designParticipants are parents and children in a well-child cohort recruited from a prenatal clinic and a diagnosed cohort recruited from pediatric clinics that treat children with disorders diagnosed through traditional NBS (goal of 200 children in each cohort). In phase 1, all parent participants use an online decision aid to decide whether to accept NGS-NBS for their child and provide consent for NGS-NBS. In phase 2, parents who consent to NGS-NBS are randomized to a decision arm or control arm (2:1 allocation) and learn their child's NGS-NBS results, which include conditions from standard (non-NGS) NBS plus other highly actionable childhood-onset conditions. Parents in the decision arm use a second decision aid to make decisions about additional results from their child's sequencing. In phase 3, decision arm participants learn additional results they have requested. Online questionnaires are administered at up to five time points. DISCUSSION: NC NEXUS will use a rigorous interdisciplinary approach designed to collect rich data to inform policy, practice, and future research.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, NCT02826694 . Registered on 11 July, 2016.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorDecision Support TechniquesExome SequencingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingInformed ConsentChild, PreschoolFemaleGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetic TestingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNeonatal ScreeningNorth CarolinaNewborn screeningParental decision aidRandomized trialSequencingTranslational genomics

Identifiers

PMID29950170
PMCPMC6022715
OpenAlexW2810860483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.