Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29950167›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2018

Does citation matter? Research citation in policy documents as an indicator of research impact - an Australian obesity policy case-study.

Robyn Newson, Lucie Rychetnik, Lesley King, Andrew Milat, Adrian Bauman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robyn NewsonSydney School of Public Health, Charles Perkins Centre D17, Level 6 Hub, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. rnewson@uni.sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7226-1726
Lucie RychetnikSchool of Medicine Sydney, University of Notre Dame Australia, 160 Oxford St, Darlinghurst, Australia.
Lesley KingSydney School of Public Health, Charles Perkins Centre D17, Level 6 Hub, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Andrew MilatSydney School of Public Health, Charles Perkins Centre D17, Level 6 Hub, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Adrian BaumanSydney School of Public Health, Charles Perkins Centre D17, Level 6 Hub, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council (AU) 1024291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCitation of research in policy documents has been suggested as an indicator of the potential longer-term impacts of research. We investigated the use of research citations in childhood obesity prevention policy documents from New South Wales (NSW), Australia, considering the feasibility and value of using research citation as a proxy measure of research impact.

methodsWe examined childhood obesity policy documents produced between 2000 and 2015, extracting childhood obesity-related references and coding these according to reference type, geographical origin and type of research. A content analysis of the policy documents examined where and how research was cited in the documents and the context of citation for individual research publications.

resultsOver a quarter (28%) of the policy documents (n = 86) were not publicly available, almost two-thirds (63%) contained references, half (47%) cited obesity-related research and over a third (41%) of those containing references used unorthodox referencing styles, making reference extraction laborious. No patterns, in terms of the types of documents more likely to cite research, were observed and the number of obesity research publications cited per document was highly variable. In total, 263 peer-reviewed and 94 non-peer-reviewed obesity research publications were cited. Research was most commonly cited to support a policy argument or choice of solution. However, it was not always possible to determine how or why individual publications were cited or whether the cited research itself had influenced the policy process. Content analysis identified circumstances where research was mentioned or considered, but not directly cited.

conclusionsCitation of research in policy documents in this case did not always provide evidence that the cited research had influenced the policy process, only that it was accessible and relevant to the content of the policy document. Research citation across these public health policy documents varied greatly and is unlikely to be an accurate reflection of actual research use by the policy agencies involved. The links between citation and impact may be more easily drawn in specific policy areas or types of documents (e.g. clinical guidelines), where research appraisal feeds directly into policy recommendations.

Indexed as

BibliometricsBiomedical ResearchHealth PolicyPublicationsPublishingHumansNew South WalesPediatric ObesityBibliometricsPolicyPublic health researchResearch impactScientometrics

Identifiers

PMID29950167
PMCPMC6022713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.