Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29950010›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018

GSEA-InContext: identifying novel and common patterns in expression experiments.

Rani K Powers, Andrew Goodspeed, Harrison Pielke-Lombardo, Aik-Choon Tan, James C Costello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 169 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
169citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

169 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A practical guide to functional enrichment analysis.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

109 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rani K PowersComputational Bioscience Program, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Andrew GoodspeedDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Harrison Pielke-LombardoComputational Bioscience Program, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Aik-Choon TanDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
James C CostelloComputational Bioscience Program, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.

Funding

University of Colorado Cancer Center Support Grant - Lung Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts with Autologous Human Immune SystemsP30CA046934 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI James V Degregori · 1988 to 2026
$117.0M
Computational Bioscience Program Training GrantT15LM009451 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Katherina Kechris-Mays, Arjun Krishnan · 2007 to 2026
$11.7M
PREDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN PHARMACOLOGYT32GM007635 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI DELL'ACQUA, MARK L · 1985 to 2023
$6.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046934NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007635NLM NIH HHS T15 LM009451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) is routinely used to analyze and interpret coordinate pathway-level changes in transcriptomics experiments. For an experiment where less than seven samples per condition are compared, GSEA employs a competitive null hypothesis to test significance. A gene set enrichment score is tested against a null distribution of enrichment scores generated from permuted gene sets, where genes are randomly selected from the input experiment. Looking across a variety of biological conditions, however, genes are not randomly distributed with many showing consistent patterns of up- or down-regulation. As a result, common patterns of positively and negatively enriched gene sets are observed across experiments. Placing a single experiment into the context of a relevant set of background experiments allows us to identify both the common and experiment-specific patterns of gene set enrichment. Results: We compiled a compendium of 442 small molecule transcriptomic experiments and used GSEA to characterize common patterns of positively and negatively enriched gene sets. To identify experiment-specific gene set enrichment, we developed the GSEA-InContext method that accounts for gene expression patterns within a background set of experiments to identify statistically significantly enriched gene sets. We evaluated GSEA-InContext on experiments using small molecules with known targets to show that it successfully prioritizes gene sets that are specific to each experiment, thus providing valuable insights that complement standard GSEA analysis. Availability and implementation: GSEA-InContext implemented in Python, Supplementary results and the background expression compendium are available at: https://github.com/CostelloLab/GSEA-InContext.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMetabolic Networks and PathwaysGene Expression ProfilingHumans

Identifiers

PMID29950010
PMCPMC6022535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.