Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29949995›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018

Asymptotically optimal minimizers schemes.

Guillaume Marçais, Dan DeBlasio, Carl Kingsford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Min-frame transformation enables more sensitive viral genome alignment.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. MELO-ED: learning locality-sensitive multi-embeddings for edit distance.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. GreedyMini: generating low-density DNA minimizers.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  7. Sequence similarity estimation by random subsequence sketching.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. The open-closed mod-minimizer algorithm.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. A near-tight lower bound on the density of forward sampling schemes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  11. k-nonical space: sketching with reverse complements.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Sketching Methods with Small Window Guarantee Using Minimum Decycling Sets.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Density and Conservation Optimization of the Generalized Masked-Minimizer Sketching Scheme.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2024
    Article
  15. OCTOPUS: Disk-based, Multiplatform, Mobile-friendly Metagenomics Classifier.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024
    Article
  16. Creating and Using Minimizer Sketches in Computational Genomics.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. ViralVectors: compact and scalable alignment-free virome feature generation.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guillaume MarçaisDepartment of Computational Biology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Dan DeBlasioDepartment of Computational Biology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Carl KingsfordDepartment of Computational Biology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

Algorithms for Managing Uncertainty in Chromosome Conformation Capture DataR01HG007104 · NHGRI · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI KINGSFORD, CARLETON LEE · 2013 to 2015
$1.3M
Data Discovery: Computational Methods for Searching Short-Read Sequencing Experiments - Administrative SupplementR01GM122935 · NIGMS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI KINGSFORD, CARLETON LEE · 2017 to 2021
$1.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG007104NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM122935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: The minimizers technique is a method to sample k-mers that is used in many bioinformatics software to reduce computation, memory usage and run time. The number of applications using minimizers keeps on growing steadily. Despite its many uses, the theoretical understanding of minimizers is still very limited. In many applications, selecting as few k-mers as possible (i.e. having a low density) is beneficial. The density is highly dependent on the choice of the order on the k-mers. Different applications use different orders, but none of these orders are optimal. A better understanding of minimizers schemes, and the related local and forward schemes, will allow designing schemes with lower density and thereby making existing and future bioinformatics tools even more efficient. Results: From the analysis of the asymptotic behavior of minimizers, forward and local schemes, we show that the previously believed lower bound on minimizers schemes does not hold, and that schemes with density lower than thought possible actually exist. The proof is constructive and leads to an efficient algorithm to compare k-mers. These orders are the first known orders that are asymptotically optimal. Additionally, we give improved bounds on the density achievable by the three type of schemes.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputational Biology

Identifiers

PMID29949995
PMCPMC6037127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.