Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29949973›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018

An optimization framework for network annotation.

Sushant Patkar, Roded Sharan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Signing protein-protein interaction networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sushant PatkarComputer Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Roded SharanBlavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: A chief goal of systems biology is the reconstruction of large-scale executable models of cellular processes of interest. While accurate continuous models are still beyond reach, a powerful alternative is to learn a logical model of the processes under study, which predicts the logical state of any node of the model as a Boolean function of its incoming nodes. Key to learning such models is the functional annotation of the underlying physical interactions with activation/repression (sign) effects. Such annotations are pretty common for a few well-studied biological pathways. Results: Here we present a novel optimization framework for large-scale sign annotation that employs different plausible models of signaling and combines them in a rigorous manner. We apply our framework to two large-scale knockout datasets in yeast and evaluate its different components as well as the combined model to predict signs of different subsets of physical interactions. Overall, we obtain an accurate predictor that outperforms previous work by a considerable margin. Availability and implementation: The code is publicly available at https://github.com/spatkar94/NetworkAnnotation.git.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalSignal TransductionSoftwareProtein Interaction MapsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID29949973
PMCPMC6022690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.