ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018
Novo&Stitch: accurate reconciliation of genome assemblies via optical maps.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic and transcriptomic analyses ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Improving the Completeness of Chromosome-Level Assembly by Recalling Sequences from Lost Contigs.Genes · 2023Article
- Article
- Filling gaps of genome scaffolds via probabilistic searching optical maps against assembly graph.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- A Cas12a-based gene editing system for Phytophthora infestans reveals monoallelic expression of an elicitor.Molecular plant pathology · 2021Article
- Article
- Advances in optical mapping for genomic research.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Review
- Chromosome-Scale Assembly of Winter Oilseed RapeFrontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- The genome of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.).The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2019Article
- Niche-specific metabolic adaptation in biotrophic and necrotrophic oomycetes is manifested in differential use of nutrients, variation in gene content, and enzyme evolution.PLoS pathogens · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: De novo genome assembly is a challenging computational problem due to the high repetitive content of eukaryotic genomes and the imperfections of sequencing technologies (i.e. sequencing errors, uneven sequencing coverage and chimeric reads). Several assembly tools are currently available, each of which has strengths and weaknesses in dealing with the trade-off between maximizing contiguity and minimizing assembly errors (e.g. mis-joins). To obtain the best possible assembly, it is common practice to generate multiple assemblies from several assemblers and/or parameter settings and try to identify the highest quality assembly. Unfortunately, often there is no assembly that both maximizes contiguity and minimizes assembly errors, so one has to compromise one for the other. Results: The concept of assembly reconciliation has been proposed as a way to obtain a higher quality assembly by merging or reconciling all the available assemblies. While several reconciliation methods have been introduced in the literature, we have shown in one of our recent papers that none of them can consistently produce assemblies that are better than the assemblies provided in input. Here we introduce Novo&Stitch, a novel method that takes advantage of optical maps to accurately carry out assembly reconciliation (assuming that the assembled contigs are sufficiently long to be reliably aligned to the optical maps, e.g. 50 Kbp or longer). Experimental results demonstrate that Novo&Stitch can double the contiguity (N50) of the input assemblies without introducing mis-joins or reducing genome completeness. Availability and implementation: Novo&Stitch can be obtained from https://github.com/ucrbioinfo/Novo_Stitch.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.