ArticlePloS one2018
Central precocious puberty in Boston boys: A 10-year single center experience.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Idiopathic Central Precocious Puberty in Boys: Results from a National Portuguese Cohort.Hormone research in paediatrics · 2026Article
- Precocious puberty in boys: current insights into etiology, genetic advances, and environmental factors.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Central precocious puberty in boys; diagnosis, treatment and follow-up: a nation-wide study.Endocrine · 2025Article
- Correlation analysis of pituitary morphometry in boys with idiopathic central precocious puberty or early puberty: implications for diagnosis.Translational pediatrics · 2025Article
- Prevalence of organic central precocious puberty in males: criteria for a high index of suspicion.Endocrine connections · 2025Article
- Central Precocious Puberty in Italian Boys: Data From a Large Nationwide Cohort.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024Article
- A Rare Case of Precocious Puberty Secondary to an LH-secreting Pituitary Adenoma.JCEM case reports · 2023Article
- Precocious Puberty in Boys: A Study Based on Five Years of Data from a Single Center in Northern ChinaJournal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology · 2021Article
- The incidence of brain lesions in central precocious puberty: The main cause for Chinese boys was idiopathic.Clinical endocrinology · 2021Article
- Etiology of Increased Referrals for Evaluation of Early Puberty in a Tertiary Care Center in Turkey: True Precocious Puberty, Obesity, or Parental Anxiety and Lack of Knowledge?Global pediatric health · 2021Article
- Association of maxillary dental developmental abnormality with precocious puberty: a case-control study.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRecent studies in the US and abroad suggest that boys are undergoing puberty at a younger age. It is unknown if this secular trend extends to boys with central precocious puberty (CPP), who sit at the extreme end of the pubertal spectrum, and if neuroimaging should remain a standard diagnostic tool. STUDY
designRetrospective chart review of all boys with CPP seen by Endocrinology at a US pediatric hospital from 2001-2010.
resultsFifty boys had pubertal onset at an average age of 7.31 years (95CI 6.83-7.89), though many did not present until nearly one year thereafter, by which time 30% were mid-to-late pubertal. Boys were predominantly non-Hispanic White and 64% were overweight/obese. The majority (64%) of boys had neurogenic CPP (CNS-CPP) with neurofibromatosis type I being the most common diagnosis. Diagnosis of CPP led to discovery of a neurogenic lesion in only 3 of 32 (9%) CNS-CPP cases. The remaining boys, with idiopathic CPP (36%), were indistinguishable from those with CNS-CPP aside from four boys who endorsed a family history of PP (22% vs. 0% among CNS-CPP cases). Importantly, there was no change in the incidence of male CPP after accounting for the increase in clinic volume during this time period.
conclusionIn this contemporary Boston-based cohort of 50 boys with CPP, most cases were neurogenic, consistent with older literature. Several idiopathic cases had a family history of PP but were otherwise indistinguishable from CNS-CPP cases. Thus, neuroimaging remains a critical diagnostic tool. We find no evidence for an increase in the prevalence of male CPP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.