Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29949598›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Global patterns of crop yield stability under additional nutrient and water inputs.

Christoph Müller, Joshua Elliott, Thomas A M Pugh, Alex C Ruane, Philippe Ciais, Juraj Balkovic, Delphine Deryng, Christian Folberth, R Cesar Izaurralde, Curtis D Jones and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Christoph MüllerPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9491-3550
Joshua ElliottUniversity of Chicago and ANL Computation Institute, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Thomas A M PughSchool of Geography, Earth & Environmental Science and Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Alex C RuaneColumbia University Center for Climate Systems Research, New York, New York, United States of America.
Philippe CiaisLaboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Juraj BalkovicEcosystem Services and Management Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
Delphine DeryngColumbia University Center for Climate Systems Research, New York, New York, United States of America.
Christian FolberthEcosystem Services and Management Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
R Cesar IzaurraldeUniversity of Maryland, Department of Geographical Sciences, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.
Curtis D JonesUniversity of Maryland, Department of Geographical Sciences, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.
Nikolay KhabarovEcosystem Services and Management Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
Peter LawrenceNational Center for Atmospheric Research, Earth System Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Wenfeng LiuLaboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Ashwan D ReddyUniversity of Maryland, Department of Geographical Sciences, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.
Erwin SchmidInstitute for Sustainable Economic Development, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Xuhui WangLaboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agricultural production must increase to feed a growing and wealthier population, as well as to satisfy increasing demands for biomaterials and biomass-based energy. At the same time, deforestation and land-use change need to be minimized in order to preserve biodiversity and maintain carbon stores in vegetation and soils. Consequently, agricultural land use needs to be intensified in order to increase food production per unit area of land. Here we use simulations of AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase 1 to assess implications of input-driven intensification (water, nutrients) on crop yield and yield stability, which is an important aspect in food security. We find region- and crop-specific responses for the simulated period 1980-2009 with broadly increasing yield variability under additional nitrogen inputs and stabilizing yields under additional water inputs (irrigation), reflecting current patterns of water and nutrient limitation. The different models of the GGCMI ensemble show similar response patterns, but model differences warrant further research on management assumptions, such as variety selection and soil management, and inputs as well as on model implementation of different soil and plant processes, such as on heat stress, and parameters. Higher variability in crop productivity under higher fertilizer input will require adequate buffer mechanisms in trade and distribution/storage networks to avoid food price volatility.

Indexed as

InternationalityCrops, AgriculturalDose-Response Relationship, DrugModels, StatisticalNutrientsWaterNutrientsWater

Identifiers

PMID29949598
PMCPMC6021068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.