Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29948954›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2018

Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Prosthetic Joint Infection.

Ryan S Charette, Christopher M Melnic

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Long-term Survival of Hip Cement Spacer: A Case Report.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2024
    Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan S CharetteResident, Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, 3737 Market Street, 6th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. ryan.charette@uphs.upenn.edu.
Christopher M MelnicDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Newton Wellesley Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Newton Wellesley Hospital · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo review the diagnosis and treatment of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) with a focus on two-stage revision arthroplasty. The text will discuss different spacer constructs in total knee and total hip arthroplasty and will present clinical outcome data for these various options. RECENT

findingsThere is no appreciable difference in infection eradication between mobile and static antibiotic spacers. Mobile spacers have shown improved knee range of motion after second-stage re-implantation. Two-stage revision arthroplasty is the gold standard treatment for PJI. The first stage involves removal of all components, cement, and compromised soft tissues with placement of an antibiotic-impregnated spacer. Spacer options include both mobile and static spacers. Mobile spacers offer maintenance of ambulation and joint range of motion between staged procedures and have shown to be as effective in eradicating infection as static spacers.

Indexed as

Antibiotic spacerProsthetic joint infectionTotal hip arthroplastyTotal knee arthroplastyTwo-stage revision

Identifiers

PMID29948954
PMCPMC6105480
OpenAlexW2807691980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.