Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29948934›Full record

ArticleEndocrine2018

Increasing soft tissue thickness does not affect trabecular bone score reproducibility: a phantom study.

Carmelo Messina, Alessandro Poloni, Vito Chianca, Domenico Albano, Luca Petruccio Piodi, Fabio Massimo Ulivieri, Luca Maria Sconfienza

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Trabecular Bone Score Reference Values for Children and Adolescents According to Age, Sex, and Ancestry.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Carmelo MessinaUnità Operativa di Radiologia Diagnostica ed Interventistica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy. carmelomessina.md@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7518-5773
Alessandro PoloniReparto di Radiologia, ASST Bergamo Est Ospedale Bolognini, Via Paderno 21, 24068, Seriate, Italy.
Vito ChiancaDipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Università Federico II, Via Panzini 5, Napoli, Italy.
Domenico AlbanoSezione di Scienze Radiologiche, Di.Bi.Med., Università degli Studi di Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Luca Petruccio PiodiGastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Fabio Massimo UlivieriBone Metabolic Unit, Nuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Luca Maria SconfienzaUnità Operativa di Radiologia Diagnostica ed Interventistica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITUniversity of Milan · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Bolognini Seriate · ITUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTrabecular Bone Score (TBS) provides an indirect score of trabecular microarchitecture from lumbar spine (LS) dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Increasing soft tissue thickness artifactually reduces TBS values; we evaluated the effect of a fictitious increase of soft tissue thickness on TBS and bone mineral density (BMD) reproducibility on a phantom model.

methodsA Hologic spine phantom was scanned with a QDR-Discovery W Hologic densitometer. Fresh pork rind layers of 5 mm were used to simulate the in-vivo soft tissues. For each scan mode (fast array [FA], array, high definition [HD]), 25 scans were consecutively performed without phantom repositioning, at 0 (no layers), 1 cm, 3 cm, and 6 cm of thickness. BMD and TBS reproducibility was calculated as the complement to 100% of least significant change.

resultsBoth BMD and TBS reproducibility slightly decreased with increasing soft tissue; this difference was statistically significant only for BMD using HD modality (reproducibility decreased from 99.4% at baseline to 98.4% at 6-cm of thickness). TBS reproducibility was slightly lower compared to that of BMD, and ranged between 98.8% (array, 0 cm) and 97.4% (FA, 6 cm). Without taking into account manufacturer BMI optimization, we found a progressive decrease of TBS mean values with increasing soft tissue thickness. The highest TBS difference between baseline scan and 6 cm was -0.179 (-14.27%) using HD.

conclusionsDespite being slightly lower than that of BMD, TBS reproducibility was not affected up to 6 cm of increasing soft tissue thickness, and was even less influenced by fat than BMD reproducibility.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonPhantoms, ImagingAdipose TissueAnimalsArtifactsBone DensityCancellous BoneConnective TissueMusclesOrgan SizeQuality ControlRed MeatReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignDual energy X-ray absorptiometryPhantomPrecisionReproducibilityTrabecular bone score

Identifiers

PMID29948934
OpenAlexW2808064371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.