Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29948868›Full record

ReviewGeroScience2018

The potential of non-myeloablative heterochronous autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for extending a healthy life span.

Primož Rožman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in GeroScience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Application of exosomes in tumor immunity: recent progresses.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Clinical implication of cellular vaccine in glioma: current advances and future prospects.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Primož RožmanBlood Transfusion Centre of Slovenia, Šlajmerjeva 6, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. primoz.rozman@ztm.si.ORCID 0000-0002-6466-4039
Blood Transfusion Centre of Slovenia · SI

Funding

Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS P3-0371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aging is a complex multifactorial process, a prominent component being the senescence of the immune system. Consequently, immune-related diseases develop, including atherosclerosis, cancer, and life-threatening infections, which impact on health and longevity. Rejuvenating the aged immune system could mitigate these diseases, thereby contributing to longevity and health. Currently, an appealing option for rejuvenating the immune system is heterochronous autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haHSCT), where healthy autologous bone marrow/peripheral blood stem cells are collected during the youth of an individual, cryopreserved, and re-infused when he or she has reached an older age. After infusion, young hematopoietic stem cells can reconstitute the compromised immune system and improve immune function. Several studies using animal models have achieved substantial extension of the life span of animals treated with haHSCT. Therefore, haHSCT could be regarded as a potential procedure for preventing age-related immune defects and extending healthy longevity. In this review, the pros, cons, and future feasibility of this approach are discussed.

Indexed as

RejuvenationAgingAnimalsCryopreservationHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansTransplantation, AutologousCryopreservationImmune-related diseases of old ageImmunosenescenceLongevityReconstitution

Identifiers

PMID29948868
PMCPMC6060192
OpenAlexW2808640474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.