Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29948858›Full record

Trial reportSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2019

Beneficial effects of adaptive servo-ventilation on natriuretic peptides and diastolic function in acute heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction and sleep-disordered breathing.

E D'Elia, P Ferrero, C Vittori, A Iacovoni, A Grosu, M Gori, V Duino, S Perlini, Michele Senni

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac function: a comparative echocardiography-conductance catheter study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2022
    Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E D'EliaCardiology Division, Cardiovascular Department, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
P FerreroCardiology Division, Cardiovascular Department, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
C VittoriCardiology Division, Cardiovascular Department, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
A IacovoniCardiology Division, Cardiovascular Department, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
A GrosuCardiology Division, Cardiovascular Department, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
M GoriCardiology Division, Cardiovascular Department, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
V DuinoCardiology Division, Cardiovascular Department, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
S PerliniClinica Medica 2 Internal Medicine Department IRCCS San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Michele SenniCardiology Division, Cardiovascular Department, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy. msenni@asst-pg23.it.
Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · ITUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) is a ventilator algorithm able to correct breathing through anticyclic support of breathing in patients with central sleep apnea (CSA). So far, very few data exist regarding the role of ASV on acute heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

methodsWe performed a single-center prospective, randomized, case-control study in consecutive acute HFpEF (left ventricle ejection fraction, LVEF ≥ 45%) patients with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB, apnea-hypopnea index, AHI > 15/h) and prevalence of CSA.

resultsWe included ten consecutive patients randomized for ASV on top of standard therapy for acute heart failure (group 1) versus standard care alone (group 2). ASV therapy significantly reduced AHI and CSA. An improvement in cardiac diastolic function was seen in group 1 compared to group 2 (E/E' 17.5 to 9.6, p < 0.02 vs 18.5 to 14.5, p = 0.4). Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) markedly decreased in cases, but not in controls (298 to 84 pg/ml, p < 0.02 vs 280 to 120 pg/ml, p = 0.06). Right ventricle (RV) function significantly improved in group 1, differently from group 2.

conclusionsAn acute use of ASV seems effective in reducing BNP and improving diastolic and RV function in acute HFpEF patients with SDB and CSA, compared to standard treatment.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAgedCase-Control StudiesComorbidityContinuous Positive Airway PressureDiastoleEchocardiographyFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedNatriuretic Peptide, BrainProspective StudiesSleep Apnea, CentralSleep Apnea SyndromesNatriuretic Peptide, BrainAdaptive servo-ventilationCentral sleep apneaDiastolic functionHeart failure with preserved ejection fractionRight ventricle

Identifiers

PMID29948858
OpenAlexW2807715450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.