Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29948768›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2018

Outcome of partially irradiated recurrent nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenoma by gamma knife radiosurgery.

Chiung-Chyi Shen, Weir-Chiang You, Ming-Hsi Sun, Shinh-Dung Lee, Hsi-Kai Tsou, Yen-Ju Chen, Meei-Ling Sheu, Jason Sheehan, Hung-Chuan Pan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A pilot study of [Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chiung-Chyi ShenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650 Taiwan Boulevard Sec. 4, 40705, Taichung, Taiwan.
Weir-Chiang YouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Ming-Hsi SunDepartment of Neurosurgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650 Taiwan Boulevard Sec. 4, 40705, Taichung, Taiwan.
Shinh-Dung LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650 Taiwan Boulevard Sec. 4, 40705, Taichung, Taiwan.
Hsi-Kai TsouDepartment of Neurosurgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650 Taiwan Boulevard Sec. 4, 40705, Taichung, Taiwan.
Yen-Ju ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650 Taiwan Boulevard Sec. 4, 40705, Taichung, Taiwan.
Meei-Ling SheuInstitute of Biomedical Science, National Chung-Hsin University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Jason SheehanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Hung-Chuan PanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650 Taiwan Boulevard Sec. 4, 40705, Taichung, Taiwan. hcpan2003@yahoo.com.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3021-7676
Taichung Veterans General Hospital · TWNational Chung Hsing University · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

Providence University, Taichung, Taiwan TCVGH-PU1068101Taichung Veterans General Hospital TCVGH-1064903C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGamma knife treatment outcome of large pituitary tumors which are only partially irradiated secondary to immediate proximity to critical structures such as the optic apparatus have not been rigorously studied. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom July 2003 to December 2013, there were 41 cases of recurrent or residual nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenoma partially treated with gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) because the adenoma obscured part of the optic apparatus on planning SRS MR imaging.

resultsThe follow up period after GKRS was 92.3 ± 5.6 months. The percentage of tumor coverage with the full dose was 88.5 ± 0.7%. Five of 43 (11.6%) patients experienced a transient visional decrease and one patient experienced a permanent visual field defect. During the follow up, two patients underwent transphenoidal surgery and one patient had a craniotomy due to tumor progression. Seven patients (16.2%) developed cortisol and thyroxine deficiencies. In multiple variant analyses, transient visual decline was correlated to the tumor volume (> 3.5 cc), percentage of tumor coverage (< 90%), the distance from the optic apparatus to the pituitary stalk (> 15 mm) and percentage of tumor above the orbital apex (65%).

conclusionIn the limited case of this cohort, we found that partially treated pituitary nonfunctioning macroadenoma yielded a high tumor control rate. However, visual decline as a result of tumor progression or radiation effect can occur in a minority of patients. The radiosurgical technique warrants further study to better define the long-term risk to benefit profile for its use in complex pituitary macroadenoma obscuring part of the optic apparatus.

Indexed as

RadiosurgeryAdenomaDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedOptic Nerve InjuriesPituitary NeoplasmsRadiation InjuriesRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTumor BurdenGamma knife radiosurgeryIrradiation optic nerve neuropathyPituitary macroadenoma

Identifiers

PMID29948768
OpenAlexW2808101690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.