Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29948767›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neuro-oncology2018

The utility of routine surveillance screening with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect tumour recurrence in children with low-grade central nervous system (CNS) tumours: a systematic review.

Simon P Stevens, Caroline Main, Simon Bailey, Barry Pizer, Martin English, Robert Phillips, Andrew Peet, Shivaram Avula, Sophie Wilne, Keith Wheatley and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The benefit of surveillance imaging for paediatric cerebellar pilocytic astrocytoma.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Simon P StevensCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Caroline MainCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Simon BaileySir James Spence Institute of Child Health, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Barry PizerAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Martin EnglishBirmingham Women and Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Robert PhillipsCentre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD), University of York, York, UK.
Andrew PeetInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Shivaram AvulaAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Sophie WilneQueen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals' NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Keith WheatleyCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Pamela R KearnsCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Jayne S WilsonCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. j.s.wilson.1@bham.ac.uk.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15958Cancer Research UK 28028Department of Health NIHR-RP-02-12-019Department of Health PB-PG-1112-29122Department of Health PDF-2014-07-072Medical Research Council G0800472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is routinely used as a surveillance tool to detect early asymptomatic tumour recurrence with a view to improving patient outcomes. This systematic review aimed to assess its utility in children with low-grade CNS tumours.

methodsUsing standard systematic review methods, twelve databases were searched up to January 2017.

resultsSeven retrospective case series studies (n = 370 patients) were included, with average follow-up ranging from 5.6 to 7 years. No randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. Due to study heterogeneity only a descriptive synthesis could be undertaken. Imaging was most frequent in the first year post-surgery (with 2-4 scans) reducing to around half this frequency in year two and annually thereafter for the duration of follow-up. Diagnostic yield ranged from 0.25 to 2%. Recurrence rates ranged from 5 to 41%, with most recurrences asymptomatic (range 65-100%). Collectively, 56% of recurrences had occurred within the first year post-treatment (46% in the first 6-months), 68% by year two and 90% by year five. Following recurrence, 90% of patients underwent treatment changes, mainly repeat surgery (72%). Five-year OS ranged from 96 to 100%, while five-year recurrence-free survival ranged from 67 to 100%. None of the studies reported quality of life measures.

conclusionThis systematic review highlights the paucity of evidence currently available to assess the utility of MRI surveillance despite it being routine clinical practice and costly to patients, their families and healthcare systems. This needs to be evaluated within the context of an RCT.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, NewbornNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalYoung AdultCentral nervous system (CNS) tumoursChildrenLow grade gliomaMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)Pilocytic astrocytomaRecurrenceSurveillanceSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID29948767
PMCPMC6132973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.