Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29948759›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2018

Postpartum Hospital Utilization among Massachusetts Women with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Monika Mitra, Susan L Parish, Ilhom Akobirshoev, Eliana Rosenthal, Tiffany A Moore Simas

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Antenatal Hospital Use among Deaf and Hard of Hearing Women.American journal of perinatology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Monika MitraThe Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Mailstop 035, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA. mmitra@brandeis.edu.
Susan L ParishBouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Ilhom AkobirshoevThe Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Mailstop 035, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA.
Eliana RosenthalBouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Tiffany A Moore SimasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 119 Belmont Street, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA.
Brandeis University · USNortheastern University · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

Pregnancy experiences of women with IDD: Family caregiver perspectivesR01HD082105 · NICHD · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI MITRA, MONIKA, PARISH, SUSAN L. · 2015 to 2019
$2.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD082105The National Institutes of Health, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development R01HD082105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives This study examined the risk of postpartum hospital admissions and emergency department (ED) visits among US women with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). Methods We used the 2002-2012 Pregnancy to Early Life Longitudinal Data System and identified deliveries to women with and without IDD. Women with IDD (n = 1104) or case subjects were identified from the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 9th Revision (ICD-9 CM) codes. The study primary outcome measures were any postpartum hospital admission and any ED visit during three critical postpartum periods (1-42, 43-90, and 1-365 days). We conducted unadjusted and adjusted survival analysis using Cox proportional hazard models to compare the occurrence of first hospital admission or ED visits between women with and without IDD. Results We found that women with IDD had markedly higher rates of postpartum hospital admissions and ED visits during the critical postpartum periods (within 1-42, 43-90, and 91-365 days) after a childbirth. Conclusion for Practice Given the heightened risk of pregnancy complications and adverse birth outcomes and the findings of this study, there is an urgent need for clinical guidelines related to the frequency and timing of postpartum care among new mothers with IDD. Further, this study provides evidence of the need for evidence-based interventions for new mothers with IDD to provide preventive care and routine assessments that would identify and manage complications for both the mother and the infant outside of the traditional postpartum health care framework.

Indexed as

Postpartum PeriodAdultDelivery, ObstetricDevelopmental DisabilitiesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHumansIntellectual DisabilityMassachusettsPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective StudiesCohort analysisDisabilityIntellectual and developmental disabilitiesObstetrics/gynecologyPostpartumPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID29948759
PMCPMC6150791
OpenAlexW2805542055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.