Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29948744›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2018

Learning the effects of psychotropic drugs during pregnancy using real-world safety data: a paradigm shift toward modern pharmacovigilance.

Angela Lupattelli, Olav Spigset, Hedvig Nordeng

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The assessment of drug safety for the fetus.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2020
    Article
  6. Overview of this issue: pharmacovigilance, what is new?International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Angela LupattelliPharmacoEpidemiology and Drug Safety Research Group, School of Pharmacy, and PharmaTox Strategic Research Initiative, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. angela.lupattelli@farmasi.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8787-3183
Olav SpigsetDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, St Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7902-9014
Hedvig NordengPharmacoEpidemiology and Drug Safety Research Group, School of Pharmacy, and PharmaTox Strategic Research Initiative, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6361-2918

Funding

European Research Council (ERC-ST-2014) 639377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing evidence on psychotropic drug safety in pregnancy has been possible thanks to the increasing availability of real-world data, i.e. data not collected in conventional randomised controlled trials. Use of these data is a key to establish psychotropic drug effects on foetal, child, and maternal health. Despite the inherent limitations and pitfalls of observational data, these can still be informative after a critical appraisal of the collective body of evidence has been done. By valuing real-world safety data, and making these a larger part of the regulatory decision-making process, we move toward a modern pregnancy pharmacovigilance. The recent uptake of real-world safety data by health authorities has set the basis for an important paradigm shift, which is integrating such data into drug labelling. The recent safety assessment of sodium valproate in pregnant and childbearing women is probably one of the first examples of modern pregnancy pharmacovigilance.

Indexed as

Abnormalities, Drug-InducedAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsPharmacovigilanceFemaleHumansPatient SafetyPharmacoepidemiologyPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPsychotropic DrugsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsPsychotropic DrugsPharmacovigilancePregnancyPsychotropic drugsReal-world dataSafety

Identifiers

PMID29948744
PMCPMC7882562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.