Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29948645›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2019

Patient Activation Mediates the Association Between Psychosocial Risk Factors and Spine Surgery Results.

Andrew R Block, Ryan J Marek, Yossef S Ben-Porath

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Does grit and self-control impact outcomes following spine surgery? Early findings from a prospective study evaluating the association between grit and self-control following minimally invasive laminectomy/microdiscectomy and anterior cervical surgery.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Presurgical Psychological Evaluation: Risk Factor Identification and Mitigation.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew R BlockTexas Back Institute, Plano, TX, 75093, USA. ablock@texasback.com.
Ryan J MarekCollege of Human Sciences and Humanities, University of Houston - Clear Lake, Houston, TX, 77008, USA.
Yossef S Ben-PorathDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH, 44242, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although spine surgery (SS) and spinal cord stimulators (SCSs) can provide significant relief for patients with intractable pain, their effectiveness is variable. Previously, a number of pre-operative psychosocial risk factors have predicted suboptimal outcomes of these procedures. However, recent research has found that "patient activation"-the extent to which patients are engaged and active in their own health care-can predict positive surgical results. The purpose of the current investigation was to determine whether patient activation helps explain associations between established psychosocial risk factors and suboptimal outcomes. Candidates for SS and SCS (n = 1254; 56.3% women, mean age 50.4 years) consented to participate in an outcome study prior to their pre-surgical psychological evaluation. Of those, 46.3% returned self-report measures an average of 180 days (SD = 79.1) post-surgery. Bootstrapped mediation analyses indicated that patient activation mediates numerous associations between psychosocial risk factors and suboptimal outcomes. That is, patients' involvement in obtaining information, decision making, and their resilience can explain why some patients do not experience adverse surgical results when pre-surgical psychosocial risk factors are present. Pre-surgical psychological evaluations should include examination of patient strengths in addition to psychosocial risk factors, so that treatments can be appropriately individualized and the most effective surgical results obtained.

Indexed as

Back PainDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePain MeasurementPatient ParticipationRisk FactorsSelf ReportSpineActivationOutcomesPersonalityPsychologySCSSpine surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.