Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29948573›Full record

Trial reportThe journal of behavioral health services & research2019

Survey Response Rate and Quality in a Mental Health Clinic Population: Results from a Randomized Survey Comparison.

Kelly Stolzmann, Mark Meterko, Christopher J Miller, Lindsay Belanger, Marjorie Nealon Seibert, Mark S Bauer

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journal of behavioral health services & research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly StolzmannCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Avenue, (152M), Boston, MA, 02130, USA. kelly.stolzmann@va.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-3491-9803
Mark MeterkoPerformance Measurement, VHA Office of Analytics and Business Intelligence (OABI), ENRM Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 200 Springs Road, Bedford, MA, 01730, USA.
Christopher J MillerCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Avenue, (152M), Boston, MA, 02130, USA.
Lindsay BelangerOregon Health and Sciences University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA.
Marjorie Nealon SeibertCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Avenue, (152M), Boston, MA, 02130, USA.
Mark S BauerCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Avenue, (152M), Boston, MA, 02130, USA.
Harvard University · USVA Boston Healthcare System · USBoston University · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the limited ability of informatics-based assessment technologies to reach individuals with serious mental health conditions, this study evaluated the feasibility and data quality of mail-out healthcare surveys in this population to assist in measure selection for a multi-site controlled implementation trial. Veterans were randomly selected from those who had received services at a mental health clinic in the Department of Veterans Affairs, and were randomly assigned to one of three questionnaire lengths. Survey length (48-127 items) was not associated with differences in response rate, percent of items missing, or data quality. However, internal consistency reliability was variable among scales and survey lengths. Additional analyses indicate the above measures of survey data quality may differ among respondents who are non-white and younger and have psychotic disorders. These results can inform survey protocols to ensure maximal representation of this vulnerable population in health planning and policy assessment.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAgedAmbulatory CareFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedPsychometricsUnited StatesVeterans

Identifiers

PMID29948573
OpenAlexW2808654382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.