Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29948570›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2018

Screening Women Aged 50-59 for CRC Using Fecal Occult Blood Test Produces Outcomes Similar to Men Undergoing Screening Colonoscopy.

Harrison M Mooers, Jennifer L Holub, David A Lieberman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harrison M MooersDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health and Science University, L461, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Jennifer L HolubDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health and Science University, L461, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
David A LiebermanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health and Science University, L461, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. lieberma@ohsu.edu.
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

National Endoscopic Database of the Clinical Outcomes Research InitiativeU01DK057132 · NIDDK · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI LIEBERMAN, DAVID A · 1999 to 2014
$12.7M
CORI: Consortium Expansion and Database EnhancementR33DK061778 · NIDDK · OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI LIEBERMAN, DAVID A · 2002 to 2004
$1.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS R33-DK61778-01NIDDK NIH HHS U01DK57132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAverage-risk women aged 50-59 years have a lower incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer relative to age-matched men, calling into question the benefit of screening colonoscopy in this age group.

aimsWe aimed to determine whether FOBT is an effective initial screening test in 50-59-year-old women.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study using a computerized endoscopic report generator. We identified 320,906 individuals who had average-risk screening colonoscopy and 32,369 who had colonoscopy for positive FOBT. The primary outcome was the positive predictive value (PPV) of FOBT for large polyp(s) greater than 9 mm, as a surrogate for advanced neoplasia.

resultsAmong patients aged 50-59 years undergoing screening colonoscopy, men were more likely than women to have large polyps (6.3 vs 4.2%, p < 0.0001). Black women undergoing screening colonoscopy had higher rates of large polyps compared to non-Black women. The PPV in FOBT-positive men aged 50-54 (11.5%) and 55-59 (14.4%) was higher than in women aged 50-54 (6.1%) and 55-59 (5.4%). Despite this lower PPV, women aged 50-54 with a positive FOBT had a similar rate of large polyps as 50-54-year-old men undergoing screening colonoscopy (6.1 vs 6.3%, p = 0.626).

conclusionsCRC screening with FOBT identifies 50-59-year-old men and women with a higher risk of large polyps. Since younger women have a lower risk of large polyps than men, screening with FOBT in 50-59-year-old non-Black women could be an effective screening strategy, with outcomes similar to the use of screening colonoscopy in 50-59-year-old men.

Indexed as

Colonic PolypsColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsMass ScreeningAge FactorsBlack or African AmericanBlack PeopleEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentSex FactorsUnited StatesColon cancerFOBTPolypsScreeningWomen

Identifiers

PMID29948570
OpenAlexW2807744038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.