Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29948397›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2018

Feasibility of implementing an electronic social support and resource visualization tool for caregivers in a neuro-oncology clinic.

Maija Reblin, Dana Ketcher, Peter Forsyth, Eduardo Mendivil, Lauren Kane, Justin Pok, Miriah Meyer, Yelena P Wu, Jim Agutter

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03026699 (Refining and Testing the Electronic Social Network Assessment Program), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03026699 completednot on this map

Refining and Testing the Electronic Social Network Assessment Program (eSNAP)

TypeobservationalSponsorH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research InstituteRan2017 to 2017Enrolled62ConditionsBrain CancerArmseSNAP, Questionnaires
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effectiveness of Skill-Building Interventions for Informal Caregivers of Adults with Cancer: a Systematic Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Benefits of supportive strategies for carers of people with high-grade glioma: a systematic review : Strategies for addressing the needs of high-grade glioma carers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Caregivers of Patients With Brain Metastases: A Description of Caregiving Responsibilities and Psychosocial Well-being.The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses · 2020
    Article
  17. Reply to: "Providing care to a family member affected by head and neck cancer: a phenomenological study".Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maija ReblinDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA. Maija.reblin@moffitt.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3108-465X
Dana KetcherDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Peter ForsythDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Eduardo MendivilUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Lauren KaneUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Justin PokUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Miriah MeyerUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Yelena P WuUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Jim AgutterUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.

Funding

Translational Approaches to Melanoma Prevention in Children at High Genetic RiskK07CA196985 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI WU, YELENA PING · 2015 to 2019
$682k
Refining and testing the electronic Social Network Assessment Program (eSNAP)R03CA201684 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI REBLIN, MAIJA · 2016 to 2017
$181k
American Cancer Society MRSG 13-234-01-PCSMNational Cancer Institute K07CA196985National Cancer Institute R03CA201684-01NCI NIH HHS K07 CA196985NCI NIH HHS R03 CA201684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe goals of this study were to assess the feasibility of a web-based application-electronic Social Network Assessment Program (eSNAP)-to automate the capture and visualization of family caregiver social network data of neuro-oncology patients.

methodsCaregivers were recruited from a neuro-oncology clinic at an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center. Participants completed baseline questionnaires on a laptop in clinic assessing demographic characteristics. After baseline, participants were randomly assigned to either create a social network visualization using eSNAP (intervention) or to usual care (control) condition. Those who used eSNAP provided likeability/usability data. All participants were asked to complete follow-up questionnaires at 3 and 6 weeks after baseline to determine feasibility of longitudinal study.

resultsWe recruited 40 caregivers of patients with primary malignant brain tumor to participate in this study. Participants rated eSNAP usability and likeability highly, indicating that eSNAP would help them consider their available social support. At 3 weeks, 90% of participants completed questionnaires and 82.5% completed questionnaires at 6 weeks.

conclusionsThere is a need to encourage family caregivers of patients with primary malignant brain tumor to engage their existing social network resources to help alleviate caregiver burden. Our findings suggest that our web-based application to address this issue is feasible to implement with high usability and likeability. This pilot study identified minor changes to the intervention to improve effectiveness and has implications for future research in this understudied population.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, protocol number NCT03026699.

Indexed as

Social SupportAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory Care FacilitiesCaregiversFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMedical OncologyMiddle AgedNeurologyPilot ProjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesCaregivingFeasibility studyNeuro-oncologySocial support

Identifiers

PMID29948397
PMCPMC6204082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.