Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29948387›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2019

The clinical implications of FDG-PET/CT differ according to histology in advanced gastric cancer.

Hong Jae Chon, Chan Kim, Arthur Cho, Yoo Min Kim, Su Jin Jang, Bo Ok Kim, Chan Hyuk Park, Woo Jin Hyung, Joong Bae Ahn, Sung Hoon Noh and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Prognostic Significance of Preoperative StagingMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Assessing the Value ofRadiology. Imaging cancer · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Primary tumor standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured onJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2020
    Article
  12. Establishment of a [Journal of gastric cancer · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hong Jae ChonMedical Oncology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, South Korea.
Chan KimMedical Oncology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9780-6155
Arthur ChoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-ku, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea.
Yoo Min KimDepartment of Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, South Korea.
Su Jin JangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, South Korea.
Bo Ok KimBiostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Research Affairs, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Chan Hyuk ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, South Korea.
Woo Jin HyungDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Joong Bae AhnDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-ku, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea.
Sung Hoon NohDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Mijin YunDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-ku, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea. yunmijin@yuhs.ac.
Sun Young RhaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-ku, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea. rha7655@yuhs.ac.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognostic impact of preoperative

methodsAs a discovery set, a total of 727 AGC patients from prospective database were analyzed according to histologic subtype with Cox proportional hazard model and p-spline curves. In addition, another 173 patients from an independent institution was assessed as an external validation set.

resultsIn multivariate analysis, high SUV

conclusionsPreoperative high SUV

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRadiopharmaceuticalsStomach NeoplasmsFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsAdvanced gastric cancerDiffuse typePET/CTPrognostic impactSignet ring cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID29948387
PMCPMC6314995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.