Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29948386›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2019

Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis of a randomized phase III study of first-line S-1 plus oxaliplatin vs. S-1 plus cisplatin.

Tomohiro Nishina, Mizutomo Azuma, Kazuhiro Nishikawa, Masahiro Gotoh, Hideaki Bando, Naotoshi Sugimoto, Kenji Amagai, Keisho Chin, Yasumasa Niwa, Akihito Tsuji and 12 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Tomohiro NishinaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, 160 Kou, Minamiumemotomachi, Matsuyama, 791-0280, Japan. tnishina@shikoku-cc.go.jp.
Mizutomo AzumaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University East Hospital, 2-1-1 Asamizodai, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, 252-0380, Japan.
Kazuhiro NishikawaDepartment of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, 2-1-14 Hoenzaka, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 540-0006, Japan.
Masahiro GotohCancer Chemotherapy Center, Osaka Medical College Hospital, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki, 569-8686, Japan.
Hideaki BandoDivision of Gastrointestinal Oncology and Digestive Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, 277-0882, Japan.
Naotoshi SugimotoDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, 1-3-3 Nakamichi, Higashinari-ku, Osaka, 537-8511, Japan.
Kenji AmagaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital, 6528 Koibuchi, Kasama, 309-1703, Japan.
Keisho ChinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR, 3-8-31 Ariake, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Yasumasa NiwaDepartment of Endoscopy, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8681, Japan.
Akihito TsujiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kochi Health Sciences Center, 2125-1 Ike, Kochi, 781-8555, Japan.
Hiroshi ImamuraDepartment of Surgery, Sakai City Hospital, 1-1-1 Minamiyasui-cho, Sakai, 590-0064, Japan.
Masahiro TsudaDepartment of Gastroenterological Oncology, Hyogo Cancer Center, 13-70 Kitaoji-cho, Akashi, 673-8558, Japan.
Hirofumi YasuiDivision of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Nagaizumi-cho, Shimonagakubo, Sunto-gun, 411-8777, Japan.
Hirofumi FujiiDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, 329-0498, Japan.
Kensei YamaguchiDivision of Gastroenterology, Saitama Cancer Center, 780 Inamachi Oaza Komuro, Kita-adachi-gun, 362-0806, Japan.
Hisateru YasuiDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, 1-1 Fukakusamukaihata-cho, Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, 612-0861, Japan.
Shuichi HironakaClinical Trial Promotion Department, Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8717, Japan.
Ken ShimadaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Chigasakichuo, Tsuzuki-ku, Yokohama, 224-0032, Japan.
Hiroto MiwaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya, 663-8131, Japan.
Terukazu MitomePharmaceutical Research and Development Department, Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd., 16-21 Ginza 7-chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan.
Hiroki KageyamaPharmaceutical Research and Development Department, Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd., 16-21 Ginza 7-chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan.
Ichinosuke HyodoDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, 305-8575, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe investigated early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) using data from the G-SOX study comparing S-1 plus oxaliplatin with S-1 plus cisplatin as the first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

methodsETS was determined as % decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of the target lesions at the first evaluation of week 6 compared to baseline. DpR was the maximum % shrinkage during the study treatment. The impact of ETS (cutoff value 20%) and DpR (continuous value) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by the log-rank test and Cox regression analysis including prognostic factors obtained in the G-SOX study; ECOG performance status, baseline sum of tumor diameters, disease status (recurrent/unresectable), and histology (diffuse/intestinal).

resultsAmong 685 patients enrolled in the G-SOX study, 632 patients who had the first tumor evaluation were analyzed. Patients with ETS ≥ 20% had longer PFS (median 4.5 vs. 2.8 months, p < 0.0001) and OS (median 14.8 vs. 10.5 months, p < 0.0001) than those with ETS < 20%. Adjusted hazard ratios of ETS < 20 vs. ≥ 20% were 0.606 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.506-0.725) for PFS and 0.589 (95% CI 0.492-0.704) for OS. DpR was also significantly associated with PFS and OS (both p < 0.0001). These results were similar between the SOX and CS groups.

conclusionsIn AGC patients receiving the first-line therapy, ETS and DpR might be predictors for PFS and OS.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCisplatinClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicOxaliplatinOxonic AcidProgression-Free SurvivalCisplatinDrug CombinationsOxaliplatinOxonic AcidS 1 (combination)TegafurChemotherapyDepth of responseEarly tumor shrinkageGastric cancerOxaliplatin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.