Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29948347›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2018

Disease and management beliefs of elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis and comorbidity: a qualitative study.

Marloes van Onna, Betül Öztürk, Mirian Starmans, Ralph Peeters, Annelies Boonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Therapeutic activity of lipoxin AFrontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marloes van OnnaDepartment of Medicine, division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box: 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. m.van.onna@mumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5535-3119
Betül ÖztürkDepartment of Medicine, division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box: 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Mirian StarmansDepartment of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6419 PC, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Ralph PeetersDepartment of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6419 PC, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Annelies BoonenDepartment of Medicine, division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box: 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To explore in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and comorbidity (1) in which order and why patients prioritize their morbidities with regard to functioning and health, (2) their beliefs about common (age-related) musculoskeletal complaints, and (3) experiences about the influence of comorbidity on medication treatment of RA. Patients between 50 and 85 years with RA and ≥ 1 comorbidity or lifestyle risk factor were invited for a semi-structured interview. Two readers coded the transcripts of the interviews, by using NVivo11 software. Fifteen patients (14 women; mean age 67 years (range 51-83 years); mean disease duration 14 years (range 1-39 years)) were interviewed. Only 3 (20%) out of 15 patients prioritized RA over their comorbidity; these patients often experienced severe functional limitations. The level of current or (perceived) future disability, risk of dependency, and the perceived lethality of a condition were considered by participants when prioritizing morbidities. Most participants had misconceptions about common age-related musculoskeletal complaints. Consequently, these participants attributed all joint complaints or even all physical complaints to RA, disregarding degenerative joint disease and physiological aging as alternative diagnoses. Half of the participants ever had to change RA medication because of comorbidity. Most of these patients had prioritized the comorbidity, sometimes even over treatment of RA disease activity. Most elderly RA patients with comorbidity prioritize the importance and treatment of comorbidity over RA. Better understanding of patients' beliefs on RA and comorbidity is essential when managing chronic conditions in elderly patients.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAgedAged, 80 and overArthritis, RheumatoidCardiovascular DiseasesComorbidityDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedMobility LimitationMusculoskeletal DiseasesNetherlandsComorbidityElderly patientsQualitative researchRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID29948347
PMCPMC6097103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.