Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29948322›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2018

Time to augment?! Impact of cement augmentation on pedicle screw fixation strength depending on bone mineral density.

Lukas Weiser, Gerd Huber, Kay Sellenschloh, Lennart Viezens, Klaus Püschel, Michael M Morlock, Wolfgang Lehmann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Can cavity-based pedicle screw augmentation decrease screw loosening? A biomechanical in vitro study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Polymethylmethacrylate-augmented screw fixation in treatment of senile thoracolumbar tuberculosis combined with severe osteoporosis].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Reduced cement volume does not affect screw stability in augmented pedicle screws.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [Intraoperative revision of initially loosened pedicle screws].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lukas WeiserDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedic Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099, Göttingen, Germany. Lukas.Weiser@med.uni-goettingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9812-4658
Gerd HuberInstitute of Biomechanics, TUHH Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany.
Kay SellenschlohInstitute of Biomechanics, TUHH Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany.
Lennart ViezensDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedic Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099, Göttingen, Germany.
Klaus PüschelInstitute of Forensic Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Michael M MorlockInstitute of Biomechanics, TUHH Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany.
Wolfgang LehmannDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedic Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099, Göttingen, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCement augmentation of pedicle screws is known to increase their mechanical strength. Aim was to evaluate the impact of cement augmentation on pedicle screw fatigue strength in dependence of the bone mineral density (BMD).

methodsTwenty-one human L2 vertebral bodies from donors between 19 and 96 years of age were used for in vitro experiments. BMD was measured using quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Two pedicle screws were inserted in each specimen and unilaterally augmented with bone cement. Fatigue testing was performed using a cranio-caudal sinusoidal, cyclic load (0.5 Hz) with increasing compression force (100 N + 0.1 N/cycles). Results were evaluated for the BMD groups: normal: BMD > 120 mg/cm

resultsThere was a significant correlation between fatigue force and BMD for the non-augmented and augmented screws (non-augmented R

conclusionsThe benefit of pedicle screw cement augmentation significantly depends on the bone mineral density and has the greatest extent of increased fatigue strength in osteoporotic vertebrae. Preoperative measurement of the BMD is strongly recommended to predict the benefit of augmentation and reinforce the decision for cement augmentation. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Indexed as

Pedicle ScrewsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomechanical PhenomenaBone CementsBone DensityCadaverEquipment Failure AnalysisFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleMaterials TestingMiddle AgedOsteoporosisBone CementsBMDBone mineral densityCement augmentationOsteoporosisPedicle screwSpine

Identifiers

PMID29948322
OpenAlexW2806221742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.