Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29948308›Full record

ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2018

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and neurocognitive function in children with primary hypertension.

Juan C Kupferman, Donald L Batisky, Joshua Samuels, Heather R Adams, Stephen R Hooper, Hongyue Wang, Marc B Lande

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Pediatrics.Current hypertension reports · 2019
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Juan C KupfermanDepartment of Pediatrics, Maimonides Medical Center, 977 48th Street, Brooklyn, NY, 11219, USA. Jkupferman@maimonidesmed.org.ORCID 0000-0001-8007-1797
Donald L BatiskyDepartment of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Joshua SamuelsDepartment of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA.
Heather R AdamsDepartment of Neurology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Stephen R HooperDepartments of Allied Health Sciences and Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Hongyue WangDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Marc B LandeDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.

Funding

The University of Rochester's Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002001 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WILSON, KAREN M., ZAND, MARTIN S · 2016 to 2024
$34.6M
The University of Rochester's Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000042 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI BENNETT, NANCY M, KIEBURTZ, KARL D. · 2012 to 2015
$14.4M
White Matter Integrity and Cognitive Performance in Adolescents with Primary HypertensionR01HL098332 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI LANDE, MARC B · 2010 to 2023
$5.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000042NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002001NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL098332NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL098332
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren with primary hypertension have been reported to have diminished scores in measures of cognition. However, little is known about the relative correlation between office and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and neurocognitive test performance, and whether short-term BP variability is associated with decreased neurocognitive function. We sought to determine whether ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was more strongly associated with neurocognitive test performance compared with office BP, and whether increased short-term BP variability was associated with lower neurocognitive scores.

methodsSeventy-five subjects ages 10-18 years, with untreated primary hypertension, and 75 matched normotensive controls completed neurocognitive testing. All subjects had office BP and ABPM prior to neurocognitive testing.

resultsOn multivariate analyses, there was no significant association between office BP and neurocognitive tests. However, several ABPM parameters were significantly associated with neurocognitive test scores in the lower quartile, in particular 24 h SBP load and wake systolic blood pressure (SBP) index [Rey Auditory Verbal learning Test (RAVLT) List A Trial 1, 24 h SBP load, odds ratio (OR) = 1.02, wake SBP index, OR = 1.06; List A Total, 24 h SBP load, OR = 1.02, wake SBP index, OR = 1.06; Short Delay Recall, wake SBP index, OR = 1.06; CogState Maze delayed recall, 24 h SBP load, OR = 1.03, wake SBP index, OR = 1.08; Grooved Pegboard, 24 h SBP load, OR = 1.02; all p < 0.05]. In contrast, short-term BP variability measures were not associated with neurocognitive test performance.

conclusionsABPM is superior to office BP in distinguishing hypertensive youth with lower neurocognitive test performance.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryAdolescentBlood PressureCase-Control StudiesChildCognitionCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMental Status and Dementia TestsAdolescenceHypertensionNeuropsychological testingObesityPediatric

Identifiers

PMID29948308
PMCPMC6129198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.