Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29948220›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2019

Egg consumption and prevalence of psychological disorders in adults.

Fateme Shafiei, Ammar Hassanzadeh Keshteli, Hamed Pouraram, Hamid Afshar, Asma Salari-Moghaddam, Ahmad Esmaillzadeh, Peyman Adibi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fateme ShafieiStudents' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8026-8645
Ammar Hassanzadeh KeshteliDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Hamed PouraramDepartment of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 14155-6117, Tehran, Iran. h-pouraram@tums.ac.ir.
Hamid AfsharDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Asma Salari-MoghaddamStudents' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ahmad EsmaillzadehDepartment of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 14155-6117, Tehran, Iran. a-esmaillzadeh@tums.ac.ir.
Peyman AdibiIntegrative Functional Gastroenterology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNo previous study has examined the associations between egg consumption and prevalence of psychological disorders. The present study was conducted to determine the association between egg consumption and depression in a large sample of Iranian adults.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted on 3172 adults in Isfahan, Iran. Egg consumption was assessed by using a validated, self-administered, dish-based, semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. The Iranian validated version of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was used to screen for anxiety and depression. The Iranian validated version of General Health Questionnaire with 12 items was used to assess psychological distress. Depression, anxiety and psychological distress were defined according to standard criteria.

resultsThe mean age of the study participants was 36.5 ± 7.9 years. Depression, anxiety and psychological distress were prevalent among 28.4, 13.6 and 23% of the study subjects, respectively. After controlling for potential confounders, no significant association was observed between egg intake and depression (OR for comparing extreme quartiles: 1.08; 95% CIs 0.80-1.45) and anxiety (OR 0.79; 95% CIs 0.54-1.16), as well as psychological distress (OR 1.03; 95% CIs 0.76-1.41) in the whole population. In men, significant positive associations were observed between egg intake and depression before controlling for BMI (OR 1.68; 95% CIs 1.01-2.80); however, the associations became non-significant after taking BMI into account (OR 1.62; 95% CIs 0.96-2.72).

conclusionsWe found no significant association between egg intake and psychological disorders. Further studies, in particular of prospective design, are warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAnxiety DisordersCross-Sectional StudiesDepressive DisorderDietEggsFemaleHumansIranMalePrevalenceStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesAnxietyDepressionDietEggEpidemiologyPsychological disorders

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.