ReviewDer Radiologe2018
[Imaging of side effects after radiation therapy].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Breast cancer radiotherapy in patients with autoimmune or cancer-associated myositis: balancing oncological benefit and immune-mediated risk.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2026Review
- Impact of patient nationality on the severity of early side effects after radiotherapy.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Review
- [Normal tissue: radiosensitivity, toxicity, consequences for planning].Der Radiologe · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeritumoral normal tissue is inevitably also irradiated during radiotherapy, depending on the location and size of the target volume as well as the cumulative dose. Depending on the temporal course after irradiation acute, subacute, and chronic alterations are described in co-irradiated normal tissue that can be detected by imaging. Radiation damage can be transient or persistent.
objectiveThis article gives an overview of the most important signs of radiation-induced radiogenic alterations to tissue in various organ systems.
findingsFrequent radiation-induced tissue alterations found by imaging are pneumonitis, disturbance of the blood-brain barrier, radionecrosis of brain tissue, radiogenic liver damage, mucositis, colitis, osteitis, osteoradionecrosis and myositis. The combination with systemic chemotherapy or immunotherapy can increase the severity of radiogenic reactions of normal tissue. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR AFTERCARE: The most important differential diagnosis for radiogenic alterations to normal tissue is post-therapeutic tumor recurrence. Besides typical latency periods, location and matching with the radiation field are important differentiation criteria, depending on the tumor biology and the radiation technique. The follow-up schedule should follow the current guidelines and the clinical condition of the patient should be additionally considered. The radiologist needs to be familiar with the typical imaging morphology of radiogenic tissue changes to avoid false interpretation during follow-up investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.