Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29947932›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2018

[Gross tumor volume (GTV) : Basics, methods, registration, limitations].

C Thieke

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

C ThiekeKlinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland. Christian.Thieke@med.uni-muenchen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical issueGross tumor volume (GTV) denotes the macroscopic tumor which as the central target volume needs to be correctly identified for successful radiotherapy. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS AND METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: In precision radiotherapy, GTV is outlined on 3D tomographic images. The basis is computed tomography (CT), which is often supplemented by additional diagnostic information, e. g. magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET). New developments like dual-energy CT, functional MRI and specific PET tracers facilitate a continuously better differentiation between tumor and surrounding normal tissue. ACHIEVEMENTS: The concept of GTV is a central part of radiotherapy and the basis of radiation treatment planning. Studies regarding the interobserver variability are performed in order to analyze the impact of different imaging modalities, interventions and observer qualifications, and to deduce steps to constantly improve the practical realization. Each tumor entity presents specific challenges which are demonstrated here using examples.

Indexed as

Tumor BurdenFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansNeoplasmsPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsInterobserver variabilityMacroscopic tumorRadiotherapyRegistrationTarget volumes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.