ArticleIntensive care medicine2018
Do trials that report a neutral or negative treatment effect improve the care of critically ill patients? No.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The premature closure of ROMPA clinical trial: mortality reduction in septic shock by plasma adsorption.BMJ open · 2019Trial
- Continuous renal replacement therapy with oXirisWorld journal of clinical cases · 2023Article
- Venous and arterial thrombosis in COVID-19: An updated narrative review.Journal of infection and public health · 2022Review
- Human albumin solutions in intensive care: A review.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2021Review
- Precision medicine for COVID-19: a call for better clinical trials.Critical care (London, England) · 2020Article
- Who may benefit most from future vitamin D intervention trials: do not forget patients on continuous renal replacement therapy.Critical care (London, England) · 2020Article
- Firmer footing for ventilating and monitoring the injured lung.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29947879What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.