Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29947804›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2019

Classification of First-Episode Schizophrenia Using Multimodal Brain Features: A Combined Structural and Diffusion Imaging Study.

Sugai Liang, Yinfei Li, Zhong Zhang, Xiangzhen Kong, Qiang Wang, Wei Deng, Xiaojing Li, Liansheng Zhao, Mingli Li, Yajing Meng and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Schizophrenia: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence Techniques Applied to Detection and Classification.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Sugai LiangMental Health Centre and Psychiatric Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yinfei LiMental Health Centre and Psychiatric Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Zhong ZhangBig Data Research Center, School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Xiangzhen KongLanguage and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Qiang WangMental Health Centre and Psychiatric Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Wei DengMental Health Centre and Psychiatric Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xiaojing LiMental Health Centre and Psychiatric Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Liansheng ZhaoMental Health Centre and Psychiatric Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Mingli LiMental Health Centre and Psychiatric Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yajing MengMental Health Centre and Psychiatric Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Feng HuangBig Data Research Center, School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Xiaohong MaMental Health Centre and Psychiatric Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xin-Min LiDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Andrew J GreenshawDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Junming ShaoBig Data Research Center, School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Tao LiMental Health Centre and Psychiatric Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Sichuan University · CNUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics · NLUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent neuroanatomical pattern recognition studies have shown some promises for developing an objective neuroimaging-based classification related to schizophrenia. This study explored the feasibility of reliably identifying schizophrenia using single and multimodal multivariate neuroimaging features. Multiple brain measures including regional gray matter (GM) volume, cortical thickness, gyrification, fractional anisotropy (FA), and mean diffusivity (MD) were extracted using fully automated procedures. We used Gradient Boosting Decision Tree to identify the most frequently selected features of each set of neuroanatomical metric and fused multimodal measures. The current classification model was trained and validated based on 98 patients with first-episode schizophrenia (FES) and 106 matched healthy controls (HCs). The classification model was trained and tested in an independent dataset of 54 patients with FES and 48 HCs using imaging data acquired on a different magnetic resonance imaging scanner. Using the most frequently selected features from fused structural and diffusion tensor imaging metrics, a classification accuracy of 75.05% was achieved, which was higher than accuracy derived from a single imaging metric. Most prominent discriminative features included cortical thickness of left transverse temporal gyrus and right parahippocampal gyrus, the FA of left corticospinal tract and right external capsule. In the independent cohort, average accuracy was 76.54%, derived from combined features selected from cortical thickness, gyrification, FA, and MD. These features characterized by GM abnormalities and white matter disruptions have discriminative power with respect to the underlying pathological changes in the brain of individuals having schizophrenia. Our results further highlight the potential advantage of multimodal data fusion for identifying schizophrenia.

Indexed as

AdultBrainDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMultimodal ImagingNeuroimagingSchizophreniaYoung Adultclassificationdiffusion tensor imaginggradient boostingschizophreniastructural magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID29947804
PMCPMC6483586
OpenAlexW2810277203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.