ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019
The choice of sequence homologs included in multiple sequence alignments has a dramatic impact on evolutionary conservation analysis.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Historical Evolution and Significance of Multiple Sequence Alignment in Molecular Structure and Function Prediction.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- Assessing the functional impact of protein binding site definition.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
- Enhancing the thermostability and activity of glycosyltransferase UGT76G1 via computational design.Communications chemistry · 2023Article
- Optimal selection of suitable templates in protein interface prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- cpxDeepMSA: A Deep Cascade Algorithm for Constructing Multiple Sequence Alignments of Protein-Protein Interactions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Integrated structure-based protein interface prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Application of the MAHDS Method for Multiple Alignment of Highly Diverged Amino Acid Sequences.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- One is not enough: On the effects of reference genome for the mapping and subsequent analyses of short-reads.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Computational Enzyme Engineering Pipelines for Optimized Production of Renewable Chemicals.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
- DeepMSA: constructing deep multiple sequence alignment to improve contact prediction and fold-recognition for distant-homology proteins.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Article
- Assessing the accuracy of contact predictions in CASP13.Proteins · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: The analysis of sequence conservation patterns has been widely utilized to identify functionally important (catalytic and ligand-binding) protein residues for over a half-century. Despite decades of development, on average state-of-the-art non-template-based functional residue prediction methods must predict ∼25% of a protein's total residues to correctly identify half of the protein's functional site residues. The overwhelming proportion of false positives results in reported 'F-Scores' of ∼0.3. We investigated the limits of current approaches, focusing on the so-far neglected impact of the specific choice of homologs included in multiple sequence alignments (MSAs). Results: The limits of conservation-based functional residue prediction were explored by surveying the binding sites of 1023 proteins. A straightforward conservation analysis of MSAs composed of randomly selected homologs sampled from a PSI-BLAST search achieves average F-Scores of ∼0.3, a performance matching that reported by state-of-the-art methods, which often consider additional features for the prediction in a machine learning setting. Interestingly, we found that a simple combinatorial MSA sampling algorithm will in almost every case produce an MSA with an optimal set of homologs whose conservation analysis reaches average F-Scores of ∼0.6, doubling state-of-the-art performance. We also show that this is nearly at the theoretical limit of possible performance given the agreement between different binding site definitions. Additionally, we showcase the progress in this direction made by Selection of Alignment by Maximal Mutual Information (SAMMI), an information-theory-based approach to identifying biologically informative MSAs. This work highlights the importance and the unused potential of optimally composed MSAs for conservation analysis. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.