ArticleAnnals of botany2019
Effects of spatial patterning of co-flowering plant species on pollination quantity and purity.
Article in Annals of botany, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The magnet species effect of two-leaf squill (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Habitat factors and traits shape plant-pollinator interactions in a semi-arid landscape.BMC ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Floral traits and density are uneven drivers of heterospecific pollen deposition in a biodiverse tropical highland community.Oecologia · 2025Article
- Spatial variation of pollen receipt and effects of heterospecific pollen on seed set inEcology and evolution · 2023Article
- Spatial variation in bidirectional pollinator-mediated interactions between two co-flowering species in serpentine plant communities.AoB PLANTS · 2021Article
- Causes and consequences of variation in heterospecific pollen receipt in Oenothera fruticosa.American journal of botany · 2021Article
- Article
- Diversity and composition of pollen loads carried by pollinators are primarily driven by insect traits, not floral community characteristics.Oecologia · 2021Article
- Shrubs as magnets for pollination: A test of facilitation and reciprocity in a shrub-annual facilitation system.Current research in insect science · 2021Article
- Edge effects and mating patterns in a bumblebee-pollinated plant.AoB PLANTS · 2020Article
- Pollen on stigmas as proxies of pollinator competition and facilitation: complexities, caveats and future directions.Annals of botany · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: If two plant species share pollinators, it has been proposed that the interaction between them may range from competitive to facilitative, depending on the way in which they intermingle. In particular, the presence of a rewarding plant species may increase the rate of pollinator visitation to a less rewarding species in its vicinity, but the beneficial increase in visitation may be counteracted by a detrimental increase in heterospecific pollen transfer. We assessed this trade-off using bumble-bees foraging over a gradual spatial transition between two plant species in an indoor cage experiment. Methods: We used two 'species' of artificial flowers - one more rewarding than the other - in arrays that varied in the degree of species intermingling. The flowers dispensed and received powdered food dyes serving as pollen analogues. Captive bumble-bees visited to collect sucrose solution. We quantified dye delivery to the adhesive-tape 'stigmas' in flowers by spectrophotometry. Key Results: Across the spatial transition between species, the less attractive species received more dye (more bee visits) when in proximity to the more attractive species than it did when alone, but the larger dye loads were less pure (more heterospecific pollen transfer). The decline in purity cancelled out the gain in acquisition, so conspecific pollen receipt by the less attractive species was neutrally affected. The more attractive species received fewer visits when surrounded by the less attractive species, so the interaction between the two species was amensalism when considering conspecific pollen reception. Conclusions: Pollinator-mediated interactions between plant species depend on pollination quantity and purity, both of which can depend on spatial intermingling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.