Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29947595›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2018

Motor planning perturbation: muscle activation and reaction time.

Stefan Delmas, Agostina Casamento-Moran, Seoung Hoon Park, Basma Yacoubi, Evangelos A Christou

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefan DelmasDepartment of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida , Gainesville, Florida.
Agostina Casamento-MoranDepartment of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida , Gainesville, Florida.
Seoung Hoon ParkDepartment of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida , Gainesville, Florida.
Basma YacoubiDepartment of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida , Gainesville, Florida.
Evangelos A ChristouDepartment of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida , Gainesville, Florida.
University of Florida · US

Funding

Training In Rehabilitation and Neuromuscular PlasticityT32HD043730 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI DAVID D FULLER · 2003 to 2026
$5.3M
Motor Control Deficits Following Transient Ischemic AttackR21NS096258 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CHRISTOU, EVANGELOS A, LODHA, NEHA · 2016 to 2017
$418k
Pathophysiology of Upper and Lower Limb Motor Control in Spinocerebellar AtaxiaR21NS093695 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CHRISTOU, EVANGELOS A, VAILLANCOURT, DAVID E · 2015 to 2016
$413k
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD043730NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS093695NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS096258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reaction time (RT) is the time interval between the appearance of a stimulus and initiation of a motor response. Within RT, two processes occur, selection of motor goals and motor planning. An unresolved question is whether perturbation to the motor planning component of RT slows the response and alters the voluntary activation of muscle. The purpose of this study was to determine how the modulation of muscle activity during an RT response changes with motor plan perturbation. Twenty-four young adults (20.5 ±1.1 yr, 13 women) performed 15 trials of an isometric RT task with ankle dorsiflexion using a sinusoidal anticipatory strategy (10-20% maximum voluntary contraction). We compared the processing part of the RT and modulation of muscle activity from 10 to 60 Hz of the tibialis anterior (primary agonist) when the stimulus appeared at the trough or at the peak of the sinusoidal task. We found that RT ( P = 0.003) was longer when the stimulus occurred at the peak compared with the trough. During the time of the reaction, the electromyography (EMG) power from 10 to 35 Hz was less at the peak than the trough ( P = 0.019), whereas the EMG power from 35 to 60 Hz was similar between the peak and trough ( P = 0.92). These results suggest that perturbation to motor planning lengthens the processing part of RT and alters the voluntary activation of the muscle by decreasing the relative amount of power from 10 to 35 Hz. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We aimed to determine whether perturbation to motor planning would alter the speed and muscle activity of the response. We compared trials when a stimulus appeared at the peak or trough of an oscillatory reaction time task. When the stimulus occurred at the trough, participants responded faster, with greater force, and less EMG power from 10-35 Hz. We provide evidence that motor planning perturbation slows the response and alters the voluntary activity of the muscle.

Indexed as

Isometric ContractionReaction TimeAnkleFemaleHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalYoung Adultelectromyographymotor neuron pool modulationreaction time

Identifiers

PMID29947595
PMCPMC6230771
OpenAlexW2811328749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.