ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2018
Motor planning perturbation: muscle activation and reaction time.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcranial photobiomodulation therapy associated with cardiorespiratory rehabilitation in spastic subjects.Lasers in medical science · 2023Trial
- Tai chi improves psychoemotional state, cognition, and motor learning in older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic.Experimental gerontology · 2021Trial
- On-Body Measure of Reaction Time Provides Real-time Triage of Impairment.Military medicine · 2026Article
- Trajectory dynamics and endpoint accuracy in targeted ballistic contractions.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- Assessment of Learning Styles and Reaction Times Among Health Care Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- A comprehensive approach to studying motor planning and execution using 3D-printed objects and motion tracking technology.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Study on the Impact of Implementing an Exercise Program Using Fitlight Technology for the Development of Upper Limb Coordinative Abilities in Basketball Players.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Age-related changes in motor planning for prior intentions: a mouse tracking reach-to-click task.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Unique Neural Mechanisms Underlying Speed Control of Low-Force Ballistic Contractions.Journal of human kinetics · 2024Article
- Non-paretic leg movements can facilitate cortical drive to the paretic leg in individuals post stroke with severe motor impairment: Implications for motor priming.The European journal of neuroscience · 2023Article
- Adolescent boys who participate in sports exhibit similar ramp torque control with young men despite differences in strength and tendon characteristics.European journal of applied physiology · 2023Article
- The Impact of Implementing an Exergame Program on the Level of Reaction Time Optimization in Handball, Volleyball, and Basketball Players.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Older adults use a motor plan that is detrimental to endpoint control.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Role of the Triceps Surae Muscles in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Matched Case-Control Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Reaction to a Visual Stimulus: Anticipation with Steady and Dynamic Contractions.Journal of human kinetics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Reaction time (RT) is the time interval between the appearance of a stimulus and initiation of a motor response. Within RT, two processes occur, selection of motor goals and motor planning. An unresolved question is whether perturbation to the motor planning component of RT slows the response and alters the voluntary activation of muscle. The purpose of this study was to determine how the modulation of muscle activity during an RT response changes with motor plan perturbation. Twenty-four young adults (20.5 ±1.1 yr, 13 women) performed 15 trials of an isometric RT task with ankle dorsiflexion using a sinusoidal anticipatory strategy (10-20% maximum voluntary contraction). We compared the processing part of the RT and modulation of muscle activity from 10 to 60 Hz of the tibialis anterior (primary agonist) when the stimulus appeared at the trough or at the peak of the sinusoidal task. We found that RT ( P = 0.003) was longer when the stimulus occurred at the peak compared with the trough. During the time of the reaction, the electromyography (EMG) power from 10 to 35 Hz was less at the peak than the trough ( P = 0.019), whereas the EMG power from 35 to 60 Hz was similar between the peak and trough ( P = 0.92). These results suggest that perturbation to motor planning lengthens the processing part of RT and alters the voluntary activation of the muscle by decreasing the relative amount of power from 10 to 35 Hz. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We aimed to determine whether perturbation to motor planning would alter the speed and muscle activity of the response. We compared trials when a stimulus appeared at the peak or trough of an oscillatory reaction time task. When the stimulus occurred at the trough, participants responded faster, with greater force, and less EMG power from 10-35 Hz. We provide evidence that motor planning perturbation slows the response and alters the voluntary activity of the muscle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.