Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29947593›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2018

The critical stability task: quantifying sensory-motor control during ongoing movement in nonhuman primates.

Kristin M Quick, Jessica L Mischel, Patrick J Loughlin, Aaron P Batista

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Generalist Intracortical Motor Decoder.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristin M QuickDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-4028-2463
Jessica L MischelDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Patrick J LoughlinDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Aaron P BatistaDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Multisensory Integration in Action: a Multineuronal and Feedback-Control ApproachR01HD090125 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BATISTA, AARON PAUL, LOUGHLIN, PATRICK J · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD090125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Everyday behaviors require that we interact with the environment, using sensory information in an ongoing manner to guide our actions. Yet, by design, many of the tasks used in primate neurophysiology laboratories can be performed with limited sensory guidance. As a consequence, our knowledge about the neural mechanisms of motor control is largely limited to the feedforward aspects of the motor command. To study the feedback aspects of volitional motor control, we adapted the critical stability task (CST) from the human performance literature (Jex H, McDonnell J, Phatak A. IEEE Trans Hum Factors Electron 7: 138-145, 1966). In the CST, our monkey subjects interact with an inherently unstable (i.e., divergent) virtual system and must generate sensory-guided actions to stabilize it about an equilibrium point. The difficulty of the CST is determined by a single parameter, which allows us to quantitatively establish the limits of performance in the task for different sensory feedback conditions. Two monkeys learned to perform the CST with visual or vibrotactile feedback. Performance was better under visual feedback, as expected, but both monkeys were able to utilize vibrotactile feedback alone to successfully perform the CST. We also observed changes in behavioral strategy as the task became more challenging. The CST will have value for basic science investigations of the neural basis of sensory-motor integration during ongoing actions, and it may also provide value for the design and testing of bidirectional brain computer interface systems. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Currently, most behavioral tasks used in motor neurophysiology studies require primates to make short-duration, stereotyped movements that do not necessitate sensory feedback. To improve our understanding of sensorimotor integration, and to engineer meaningful artificial sensory feedback systems for brain-computer interfaces, it is crucial to have a task that requires sensory feedback for good control. The critical stability task demands that sensory information be used to guide long-duration movements.

Indexed as

Feedback, PhysiologicalModels, NeurologicalMotor ActivityPsychomotor PerformanceAnimalsHaplorhiniNeurons, AfferentNeurons, EfferentPostural Balanceartificial feedbackmotor controlsensory feedbackunstable systemsvibrotactile feedback

Identifiers

PMID29947593
PMCPMC6295547
OpenAlexW2810366765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.