Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29947591›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2018

Detecting multivariate cross-correlation between brain regions.

Jordan Rodu, Natalie Klein, Scott L Brincat, Earl K Miller, Robert E Kass

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Latent Dynamic Factor Analysis of High-Dimensional Neural Recordings.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jordan RoduDepartment of Statistics, University of Virginia , Charlottesville, Virginia.ORCID 0000-0001-6641-2532
Natalie KleinDepartment of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Scott L BrincatThe Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Earl K MillerThe Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Robert E KassDepartment of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Diversity supplement to Analysis of Nonstationary Point Process DataR01MH064537 · NIMH · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI KASS, ROBERT E · 2001 to 2024
$7.2M
Cortical Circuits for Attention and DecisionsR37MH087027 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MILLER, EARL K · 2010 to 2019
$4.7M
Prefrontal and temporal lobe mechanisms of declarative memoryF32MH081507 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BRINCAT, SCOTT L · 2008 to 2010
$155k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH081507NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH064537NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH087027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The problem of identifying functional connectivity from multiple time series data recorded in each of two or more brain areas arises in many neuroscientific investigations. For a single stationary time series in each of two brain areas statistical tools such as cross-correlation and Granger causality may be applied. On the other hand, to examine multivariate interactions at a single time point, canonical correlation, which finds the linear combinations of signals that maximize the correlation, may be used. We report here a new method that produces interpretations much like these standard techniques and, in addition, 1) extends the idea of canonical correlation to 3-way arrays (with dimensionality number of signals by number of time points by number of trials), 2) allows for nonstationarity, 3) also allows for nonlinearity, 4) scales well as the number of signals increases, and 5) captures predictive relationships, as is done with Granger causality. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the method through simulation studies and illustrate by analyzing local field potentials recorded from a behaving primate. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Multiple signals recorded from each of multiple brain regions may contain information about cross-region interactions. This article provides a method for visualizing the complicated interdependencies contained in these signals and assessing them statistically. The method combines signals optimally but allows the resulting measure of dependence to change, both within and between regions, as the responses evolve dynamically across time. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the method through numerical simulations and by uncovering a novel connectivity pattern between hippocampus and prefrontal cortex during a declarative memory task.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsConnectomeHippocampusMemoryPrefrontal CortexPrimatescanonical correlation analysiscross correlationfunctional connectivitykernel canonical correlation analysisLFP

Identifiers

PMID29947591
PMCPMC6230799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.