Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29947442›Full record

Observational studyTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2018

Do HIV treatment eligibility expansions crowd out the sickest? Evidence from rural South Africa.

Sheryl A Kluberg, Matthew P Fox, Michael LaValley, Deenan Pillay, Till Bärnighausen, Jacob Bor

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. CD4+ T-Cell Count at Antiretroviral Therapy Initiation in the "Treat-All" Era in Rural South Africa: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Sheryl A KlubergDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Matthew P FoxDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael LaValleyDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Deenan PillayAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban and Somkhele, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Till BärnighausenAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban and Somkhele, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Jacob BorDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Africa Health Research Institute · ZABoston University · USUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

Economic, health, and behavioral dimensions of HIV treatment scale-upK01MH105320 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI BOR, JACOB · 2015 to 2018
$613k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH105320PEPFARWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe 2015 WHO recommendation to initiate all HIV patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) at diagnosis could potentially overextend health systems and crowd out sicker patients, mitigating the policy's impact. We evaluate whether South Africa's prior eligibility expansion from CD4 ≤ 200 to CD4 ≤ 350 cells/μl reduced ART uptake in the sickest patients.

methodsUsing data on all patients presenting to the Hlabisa HIV Treatment and Care Programme in KwaZulu-Natal from April 2010 to June 2012 (n = 13 809), we assessed the impact of the August 2011 eligibility expansion on the number of patients seeking care, number initiating ART and time from HIV diagnosis to ART initiation among patients always eligible (CD4 0-200), newly eligible (CD4 201-350) and not yet eligible by CD4 count (>350). We used interrupted time series methods to control for long-run trends and isolate the effect of the policy.

resultsExpanding ART eligibility led to an increased number of patients initiating ART per month [+95.5; 95% CI (-1.3; 192.3)]. Newly eligible patients (CD4 201-350) initiated treatment 47% faster than before (95% CI 19%; 82%), while the sickest patients (CD4 ≤ 200) saw no decline in the monthly number of patients initiating treatment or the rate of treatment uptake.

conclusionThe Hlabisa programme successfully extended ART to patients with CD4 ≤ 350 cells/μl, while ensuring that the sickest patients did not experience delays in ART initiation. Treatment programmes must be vigilant to maintain quality of care for the sickest as countries move to treat all patients irrespective of CD4 count.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-HIV AgentsCohort StudiesEligibility DeterminationFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleProgram EvaluationRural PopulationSouth AfricaAnti-HIV AgentsadultesadultsAfrique du Sudantiretroviral therapycontinuité des soinscontinuity of caredirectivesguidelinesHIV/AIDSSouth Africathérapie antirétrovirale

Identifiers

PMID29947442
PMCPMC6175239
OpenAlexW2810222534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.