Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29946997›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of surgical oncology2018

Outcomes and Treatment Options for Duodenal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Laura L Meijer, Anna J Alberga, Jacob K de Bakker, Hans J van der Vliet, Tessa Y S Le Large, Nicole C T van Grieken, Ralph de Vries, Freek Daams, Barbara M Zonderhuis, Geert Kazemier

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of surgical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Muir-Torre syndrome in a patient with advanced duodenal carcinoma.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura L MeijerDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anna J AlbergaDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jacob K de BakkerDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hans J van der VlietDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tessa Y S Le LargeDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nicole C T van GriekenDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ralph de VriesMedical Library, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Freek DaamsDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Barbara M ZonderhuisDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Geert KazemierDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. g.kazemier@vumc.nl.
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLAcademic Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuodenal adenocarcinoma (DA) is a rare tumor for which survival data per treatment modality and disease stage are unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to summarize the current literature on patient outcome after surgical, (neo)adjuvant, and palliative treatment in patients with DA.

methodsA systematic search was performed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, to 25 April 2017. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS), specified for treatment strategy or disease stage. Random-effects models were used for the calculation of pooled odds ratios per treatment modality. Included papers were also screened for prognostic factors.

resultsA total of 26 observational studies, comprising 6438 patients with DA, were included. Of these, resection with curative intent was performed in 71% (range 53-100%) of patients, and 29% received palliative treatment (range 0-61%). The pooled 5-year OS rate was 46% after curative resection, compared with 1% in palliative-treated patients (OR 0.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-0.09, p < 0.0001). Both segmental resection and pancreaticoduodenectomy allowed adequate assessment of lymph node involvement and resulted in similar OS. Lymph node involvement correlated with worse OS (pooled 5-year survival rate 21% for nodal metastases vs. 65% for node-negative disease; OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.11-0.27, p < 0.0001). In the current literature, no survival benefit for adjuvant therapy after curative resection was found.

conclusionResection with curative intent, either pancreaticoduodenectomy or segmental resection, and lack of nodal metastases, favors survival for DA. Further studies exploring multimodality (neo)adjuvant therapy are warranted to investigate their benefit.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantChemotherapy, AdjuvantDuodenal NeoplasmsHumansLymphatic MetastasisMetastasectomyNeoadjuvant TherapyPalliative CarePancreaticoduodenectomySurvival RateTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID29946997
PMCPMC6097725
OpenAlexW2810131702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.