Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29946965›Full record

ReviewPhotosynthesis research2018

Rather rule than exception? How to evaluate the relevance of dual protein targeting to mitochondria and chloroplasts.

Mayank Sharma, Bationa Bennewitz, Ralf Bernd Klösgen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Photosynthesis research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Photosynthetic demands on translational machinery drive retention of redundant tRNA metabolism in plant organelles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. LC-MS Based Draft Map of theFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  11. Genome communication in plants mediated by organelle-n-ucleus-located proteins.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mayank SharmaInstitute of Biology - Plant Physiology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Weinbergweg 10, 06120, Halle/Saale, Germany.
Bationa BennewitzInstitute of Biology - Plant Physiology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Weinbergweg 10, 06120, Halle/Saale, Germany.
Ralf Bernd KlösgenInstitute of Biology - Plant Physiology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Weinbergweg 10, 06120, Halle/Saale, Germany. klosgen@pflanzenphys.uni-halle.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dual targeting of a nuclearly encoded protein into two different cell organelles is an exceptional event in eukaryotic cells. Yet, the frequency of such dual targeting is remarkably high in case of mitochondria and chloroplasts, the two endosymbiotic organelles of plant cells. In most instances, it is mediated by "ambiguous" transit peptides, which recognize both organelles as the target. A number of different approaches including in silico, in organello as well as both transient and stable in vivo assays are established to determine the targeting specificity of such transit peptides. In this review, we will describe and compare these approaches and discuss the potential role of this unusual targeting process. Furthermore, we will present a hypothetical scenario how dual targeting might have arisen during evolution.

Indexed as

Biological AssayBiological EvolutionChloroplastsMitochondriaProtein TransportSymbiosisDual targetingEndosymbiotic organellesEvolutionary remnantProtein transportSubcellular localization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.